2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-021-11413-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic sign detection algorithm based on feature expression enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of STC-YOLO with state-of-theart methods on the CCTSDB2021 dataset is shown in Table 6. It can be seen that STC-YOLO outperformed the one-stage methods ESSD [37], YOLOv3 + MAF + SIA [49], M-YOLO [38], and YOLOv5s in the mAP. Compared with the two-stage method Faster R-CNN + ACFPN + Auto Augment [50], STC-YOLO achieved a comparable mAP and outstanding speed for real detection.…”
Section: Performance On the Tt100k Datasetmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison of STC-YOLO with state-of-theart methods on the CCTSDB2021 dataset is shown in Table 6. It can be seen that STC-YOLO outperformed the one-stage methods ESSD [37], YOLOv3 + MAF + SIA [49], M-YOLO [38], and YOLOv5s in the mAP. Compared with the two-stage method Faster R-CNN + ACFPN + Auto Augment [50], STC-YOLO achieved a comparable mAP and outstanding speed for real detection.…”
Section: Performance On the Tt100k Datasetmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Zhang et al [36] used the Cascade R-CNN [8] combined with the sample balance method to detect traffic signs, achieving ideal detection results on both CCTSDB and GTSDB. Sun et al [37] proposed a feature expression enhanced SSD detection algorithm, which achieved an 81.26% and 90.52% mAP on TT100K and CCTSDB, respectively. However, the detection speed of this algorithm was only 22.86 FPS and 25.08 FPS, which could not achieve real-time performance.…”
Section: Traffic Signs Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%