2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1,365
1
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,844 publications
(1,375 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
1,365
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We use two publicly available datasets for our experiments, which we refer to as DROSOPHILA [9], which consists of two stacks of 20 EM sections with 4×4×40nm resolution (1024× 1024 × 20 pixels), and MOUSE CORTEX [10], which consists of two stacks of 100 EM sections with 6×6×30nm resolution (1024 × 1024 × 100 pixels). We split the parts for which ground truth was available into two stacks of equal size (2×10 sections for DROSOPHILA and 2 × 50 sections for MOUSE CORTEX).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use two publicly available datasets for our experiments, which we refer to as DROSOPHILA [9], which consists of two stacks of 20 EM sections with 4×4×40nm resolution (1024× 1024 × 20 pixels), and MOUSE CORTEX [10], which consists of two stacks of 100 EM sections with 6×6×30nm resolution (1024 × 1024 × 100 pixels). We split the parts for which ground truth was available into two stacks of equal size (2×10 sections for DROSOPHILA and 2 × 50 sections for MOUSE CORTEX).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage shrub canopy and intershrub area was calculated for the five sites using high-resolution satellite imagery from Google Earth (2016d-e), which were cropped to the same dimensions and segmented using the Trainable Weka Segmentation plugin for Fiji (http://fiji.sc/Fiji). Sobel and Gaussian blur filters were used for edge detection and noise suppression, respectively (Arganda-Carreras et al, 2017). The out-of-bag error for all sites classified was <2%.…”
Section: Study Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ImageSURF classifiers are built from the training input using an optimised implementation of the random forests algorithm [8] adapted from the FastRandomForest [9] plugin for the WEKA environment [10], which is the default classifier used by Trainable Segmentation [6,7]. Features are stored as size-efficient primitive data structures (byte or short arrays for 8-bit and 16-bit images, respectively) and may be pre-calculated and saved to disk.…”
Section: Implementation and Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open-source trainable segmentation tools, such as Ilastik [3] or the Trainable Segmentation [6] plugin for ImageJ [7], address many of these issues by using supervised machine learning algorithms to study 'training set' of pixels, which have been manually assigned class annotations, and create a model (' classifier') to reliably discriminate between these classes. The context of each pixel (e.g., intensity, texture, edges, entropy) can be considered, making the classifier more robust to image artifacts and intensity shifts [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%