Trained modulation of sensorimotor rhythms can affect reaction time

Abstract

Objective Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology might be useful for rehabilitation of motor function. This speculation is based on the premise that modifying the EEG will modify behavior, a proposition for which there is limited empirical data. The present study examined the possibility that voluntary modulation of sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) can affect motor behavior in normal human subjects. Methods Six individuals performed a cued-reaction task with variable warning periods. A typical variable foreperiod effect was associated with SMR desynchronization. SMR features that correlated with reaction times were then used to control a two-target cursor movement BCI task. Following successful BCI training, the reaction time task was embedded within the cursor movement task. Results Voluntarily increasing SMR beta rhythms was associated with longer reaction times and decreasing SMR beta rhythms with shorter reaction times. Conclusions Voluntary modulation of EEG SMR can affect motor behavior. Significance These results encourage studies that integrate BCI training into rehabilitation protocols and examine its capacity to augment restoration of useful motor function.

Expert-novice differences in SMR activity during dart throwing

“…The functional meaning of SMR requires further investigation by comparing the best and worst performance within highly skilled performers. Although some studies have found that higher SMR power was related to superior attentional performance (Egner & Gruzelier, 2001Hoedlmoser et al, 2008), others have indicated that SMR was not essential in musical performance or for an audiovisual Go/NoGo cursor movement task (Boulay, Sarnacki, Wolpaw, & McFarland, 2011). Additionally, EEG provides real-time cortical processing information during motor performance (Divekar & John, 2013), but it is limited in its ability to generate information on how the sensorimotor cortex works with the other relevant regions during motor execution (Thompson, Steffert, Ros, Leach, & Gruzelier, 2008).…”

Brain–machine interfaces for rehabilitation of poststroke hemiplegia

“…Recently, it has been shown that repeated use of a BMI can promote the neural plasticity of motor maps and increase functional connectivity influencing motor behavior, eg, reaction time (Boulay et al, 2011). Based on this finding, BMIs are currently being tested as therapeutic tools for various brain disorders, such as attention-deficit disorder (Lim et al, 2012), epilepsy (Strehl et al, 2014), and depression (Zotev et al, 2016).…”

What is Neurofeedback: An Update

“…Neurofeedback also has documented results for cognitive and memory enhancement in normal individuals (Angelakis et al, 2007;Boulay, Sarnacki, Wolpaw, & McFarland, 2011;Egner, Strawson, & Gruzelier, 2002;Fritson, Wadkins, Gerdes, & Hof, 2007;Gruzelier, Egner, & Vernon, 2006;Hanslmayer, Sauseng, Doppelmayr, Schabus, & Klimesch, 2005;Hoedlmoser et al, 2008;Keizer, Verment, & Hommel, 2010;Rasey, Lubar, McIntyre, Zoffuto & Abbott, 1996;Vernon et al, 2003;Zoefel, Huster, & Herrmann, 2010). Neurofeedback to enhance cognitive functioning and to counter the effects of aging has been referred to as ''brain brightening'' (Budzynski, 1996).…”