2021
DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2021.1897577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trained to Disbelieve: The Normalisation of Suspicion in a Swiss Asylum Administration Office

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was presumed that perceived threats were strong mediators of suspicion towards refugees because of the ‘fake refugees’ rhetoric that was widespread among anti‐refugee protesters during the period of the Yemeni refugee arrivals. Indeed, in many refugee‐accepting countries, a ‘culture of disbelief’ is embedded in the asylum administrations and public political discourse on refugees (Affolter, 2021; Every & Augoustinos, 2008). This ‘default mode’ of suspicion is justified by the rationale that ‘bogus’ and therefore ‘undeserving’ refugees with economic motivations should be distinguished from ‘genuine’ refugees and screened out through the refugee status determination process (Borrelli, 2020).…”
Section: The Refugee‐related Discourse and The Anti‐refugee Movement ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was presumed that perceived threats were strong mediators of suspicion towards refugees because of the ‘fake refugees’ rhetoric that was widespread among anti‐refugee protesters during the period of the Yemeni refugee arrivals. Indeed, in many refugee‐accepting countries, a ‘culture of disbelief’ is embedded in the asylum administrations and public political discourse on refugees (Affolter, 2021; Every & Augoustinos, 2008). This ‘default mode’ of suspicion is justified by the rationale that ‘bogus’ and therefore ‘undeserving’ refugees with economic motivations should be distinguished from ‘genuine’ refugees and screened out through the refugee status determination process (Borrelli, 2020).…”
Section: The Refugee‐related Discourse and The Anti‐refugee Movement ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, numerous authors have shown that migration administrations – and in particular asylum procedures – are pervaded by a ‘culture of disbelief’ (Bohmer and Shuman 2018 ; Borrelli 2022 ; Griffiths 2012 ; Jubany 2017 ). Accordingly, a suspicion by-default approach is considered as a sign of professionalism by many caseworkers, efficiently resulting in an inversion of the burden of proof (Affolter 2022 ). It is the asylum seeker who has to convince caseworkers of the credibility of their ‘protection story’ and the existence of verifiable ‘well-founded fear’ through a narrative that is considered as ‘consistent’ and ‘plausible’ by caseworkers as its core features resonate with available ‘country of origin information’ (COI) (Thomas 2006 ; van der Kist 2024 , this issue).…”
Section: A Material-semiotic Reading Of Asylum Procedures: Human-mach...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special section in Geopolitics examines institutionalized suspicion of migrants as an entry point for identifying how disbelief shapes administrative frameworks (Borrelli et al, 2022). For example, Affolter (2022) shows how doubt and distrust are built into the institutional socialization of asylum case workers within the Swiss Secretariat for Migration.…”
Section: Institutionalized Suspicion Of Migrantsmentioning
confidence: 99%