Women faculty are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) disciplines. The ADVANCE Institutional Transformation project at a large private technical university (supported by NSF Award No. 1209115), referred to as AdvanceRIT, aims to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty (which includes social and behavioral sciences, SBS, faculty) by removing barriers to resources that support career success and by creating new interventions and resources.This paper reports on the development of efforts to activate change for STEM faculty in the form of an internal grant program, Connect Grants, as part of the AdvanceRIT project. The grants support leadership and career development for all tenured and pretenured faculty. The Connect Grants are outside of the normal processes and procedures as defined by the university. Support for the grants is also outside of the normal budgetary resourcing that is defined for the divisions, colleges, and departments. By providing a framework for the activities outside of the defined university processes and budget allocations, the AdvanceRIT project aims to support creative, innovative, and disruptive efforts toward reaching its end goals.The grant program has two distinct funding tracks: one for faculty and one for department heads. The Faculty/Faculty Group Connect Grants are designed to broaden faculty opportunities and enhance plans of work associated with tenure and promotion preparation, as well as overall career advancement. Department Connect Grants support creative, innovative, and disruptive department-level efforts to guide and manage faculty through various career stages and project-oriented work to facilitate institutional transformation. Programming supported by Connect grants includes peer-to-peer mentoring, gendered citation disparities in philosophy of science, and post-tenure mentoring and leadership initiatives. Using evidence to support institutional transformation is critical; hence, the results of quantitative and qualitative data analyses informed the development of the Connect Grants program. This paper demonstrates how faculty climate and mentoring surveys, NSF Indicator objective data, and focus group results informed the development of this internal grants program. Additionally, it describes the framework for implementing this internal grants program and the outcomes of the awarded grants.