2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training in aspiration abortion care: An observational cohort study of achieving procedural competence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Californian certified midwives, nurse practitioners and physician assistants underwent training, based on education programmes used for family practice residence, to perform MVAs. The health practitioners’ confidence grew after they became competent and their ability to manage clinical issues increased with experience (Levi, Angel James, & Taylor, 2012; Levi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Californian certified midwives, nurse practitioners and physician assistants underwent training, based on education programmes used for family practice residence, to perform MVAs. The health practitioners’ confidence grew after they became competent and their ability to manage clinical issues increased with experience (Levi, Angel James, & Taylor, 2012; Levi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other two laws, AB980 and AB154, which were passed in 2013, removed multiple infrastructural and regulatory barriers to the provision of abortion care and allowed advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to provide firsttrimester aspiration abortions. These laws were grounded in evidence from a 6-year noninferiority study to assess the safety, efficacy, and perceived competence and confidence of APRNs in the provision of abortion care (Levi et al, 2018;Weitz et al, 2013;Weitz et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 19,24,25,32,39,41,42,45,55,63,68,77,89,94,105,111,116,119,127,138,140,141,[143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154] Simulation Debrief (n = 34) A debrief session among simulation participants following the formal simulation. [27,48,49,52,59,83,87,88,92,[96][97][98]100,104,[111][112][113]115,…”
Section: Training Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32,46,66,90,99,104,106,140,143,157] One-on-One (n = 6) A trainer meeting with a participant individually to provide training. [24,32,68,84,108,158] Grand Rounds (n = 4) A type of medical education in which a particular audience of clinicians gather to discuss medical problems and treatments. [19,24,25,111] Journal Club (n = 2) A group of people meeting to discuss recent articles in academic literature.…”
Section: Training Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%