1996
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci1402_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training of Perceptual Unit Processing in Children With A Reading Disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was achieved when exposure times were gradually reduced to about 200 ms, being too short to allow for an elaborate grapheme-by-grapheme strategy. Using a closed set of sublexical units (mostly CV-or VC-syllables) to be detected in large series of different flashed words, the study of Das-Smaal, Klapwijk and van der Leij (1996) suggests that, in order to facilitate transfer, repeated practice of sublexical entities is effective, both with regard to new words with the trained units and to words with untrained units. It is important to note that these studies suggest that, although the focus is on phonological recoding, the strategy of elaborate grapheme-bygrapheme processing should be discouraged, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was achieved when exposure times were gradually reduced to about 200 ms, being too short to allow for an elaborate grapheme-by-grapheme strategy. Using a closed set of sublexical units (mostly CV-or VC-syllables) to be detected in large series of different flashed words, the study of Das-Smaal, Klapwijk and van der Leij (1996) suggests that, in order to facilitate transfer, repeated practice of sublexical entities is effective, both with regard to new words with the trained units and to words with untrained units. It is important to note that these studies suggest that, although the focus is on phonological recoding, the strategy of elaborate grapheme-bygrapheme processing should be discouraged, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the seminal work of Frederiksen (Frederiksen, Warren, & Rosebery, 1985), the beneficial effects of flashed presentations on phonological decoding and word identification were demonstrated by several studies (e.g., Das-Smaal, Klapwijk, & Van der Leij, 1996;Kappers, 1997;Van den Bosch et al, 1995). According to Snellings, van der leij, de Jong, and Blok (2009) it is important to note that these studies focused on the sublexical level to generate transfer effects and not on the repeated-word level, which affects only word-specific knowledge (i.e., the overlearning of trained words, not affecting new words; Van Daal & Van der Leij, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speeded word and pseudoword processing may not only be a useful way to differentiate individual reading profiles within the dyslexic population from a diagnostic point of view but also as a way to stimulate orthographic processing at the (sub) lexical level in instruction and remediation (see for example, Das-Smaal, Klapwijk, & van der Leij, 1996;van den Bosch, van Bon, & Schreuder, 1995). Therefore it seems of importance to include silent reading measures and tasks that rely on higher-order word-recognition skills in instruction and remediation in classrooms and future studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%