2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.20.23286194
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training parameters and longitudinal adaptations that most strongly mediate walking capacity gains from high-intensity interval training post-stroke

Abstract: Background: Locomotor high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to improve walking capacity more than moderate-intensity aerobic training (MAT) after stroke, but it is unclear which training parameter(s) should be prioritized (e.g. speed, heart rate, blood lactate, step count) and to what extent walking capacity gains are the result of neuromotor versus cardiorespiratory adaptations. Objective: Assess which training parameters and longitudinal adaptations most strongly mediate 6-minute walk distan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expanding on this topic, the study from improved walking performance on the 6-MWT with higher preferred walking speed within the HIIT group [27]. The authors correlate this to a higher stepping rate but especially to training speed [49], which is greater in the HIIT group because of the need to reach a higher intensity compared to MICT. Valkenborghs et al (2019) support that HIIT increases performance in 6-MWT as well [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Expanding on this topic, the study from improved walking performance on the 6-MWT with higher preferred walking speed within the HIIT group [27]. The authors correlate this to a higher stepping rate but especially to training speed [49], which is greater in the HIIT group because of the need to reach a higher intensity compared to MICT. Valkenborghs et al (2019) support that HIIT increases performance in 6-MWT as well [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%