Training programs throughout Europe in Internal Medicine: Are there critical differences between northern and southern countries? An international survey

Sada, Pablo Ruiz; Antía, Itziar Garmendia; Martínez, Miriam López

doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2015.12.013

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

And In1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…5 In 2016, Sada et al gathered data from several European countries, Canada and Israel, which showed a differential training trend as between north and south. 6 In 2016, Braun et al carried out a comparative study of IM training periods in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, and reported a reasonable degree of uniformity among them. 7 To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no studies that comprehensively compare different IM training pathways worldwide.…”

Section: And Inmentioning

confidence: 99%

Being an internist throughout the world – same name, different training curricula

Freire

Sopeña

Carballo

et al. 2020

Internal Medicine Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the 79 countries revised, two fundamental internal medicine (IM) training patterns were in evidence, first, only basic training needed, requiring a 3–4‐year residency period for obtaining the diploma of internist; and advanced training needed, requiring 5–7 years of study. Second, evaluation of common IM training for sub‐specialists revealed the following three patterns: dual training; core training and separate training.

show abstract

Section: And Inmentioning

confidence: 99%