2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-021-09953-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training students in evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews: a systematic review and empirical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We followed evidence-based software engineering approach [51] to conduct this research. As part of our research methodology, we adopted the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to identify, analyse, and investigate the available literature based on the outlined research questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed evidence-based software engineering approach [51] to conduct this research. As part of our research methodology, we adopted the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to identify, analyse, and investigate the available literature based on the outlined research questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, this paper conducts a comprehensive review to identify applications of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) models in the context of public security, with the main objective of providing guidance and support for readers interested in this area. To achieve this, a methodology was applied, consisting of the steps presented in Figure 1, based on the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham et al [54], Pizard et al [55], and the systematic review guide proposed by Okoli [56], taking as objectives:…”
Section: Slr Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They propose a framework and a set of recommendations to help the community to produce and consume credible evidence. Pizard et al [42] proposed to improve the practice to obtain better results.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%