1964
DOI: 10.1080/0013188640060305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training the Administrator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…716 Braithwaite envisions a "restorative and responsive regulation of human rights" but does not develop this beyond bottom-up diplomacy and reintegrative shaming. 717 An examination of the responsive regulatory model illuminates this vision, with a preference for dialogue and collaboration, an ability to escalate and de-escalate, and the engagement of all relevant stakeholders. Where this model fails to achieve constructive outcomes, it points not to the deficiency of restorative justice, but rather the need to apply restorative principles and practices across the entirety of the engagement process.…”
Section: Chapter VIII Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…716 Braithwaite envisions a "restorative and responsive regulation of human rights" but does not develop this beyond bottom-up diplomacy and reintegrative shaming. 717 An examination of the responsive regulatory model illuminates this vision, with a preference for dialogue and collaboration, an ability to escalate and de-escalate, and the engagement of all relevant stakeholders. Where this model fails to achieve constructive outcomes, it points not to the deficiency of restorative justice, but rather the need to apply restorative principles and practices across the entirety of the engagement process.…”
Section: Chapter VIII Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%