2020
DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2020.1802722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training Theories of Mind in Post-conflict Northern Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This training in porousness renders the North American evangelicals more similar to my Ugandan informants than they might otherwise be, because they are training their minds to experience themselves as porous in similar ways. This also points to the training aspect being central to debates about minds in different cultural settings (Cassaniti & Luhrmann, 2014;Kirmayer & Ramstead, 2017;Williams, 2020). I would argue that the conceptual approach to minds and mental illness, although building on Luhrmann's (2012a) work from North America, is applicable in an Acholi context not just because it deals with a similar kind of religious practice, but because of the way these religious practices are conceptualized; as cultural skills that are learned and that come to work as tools of the mind, or as cultural affordances that shape "regimes of attention" (Ramstead, Veissi ere, & Kirmayer, 2016, p. 3) or "cultural expectations" (Cassaniti & Luhrmann, 2014, p. 333).…”
Section: Training Regimes Of Attention Through Prayermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This training in porousness renders the North American evangelicals more similar to my Ugandan informants than they might otherwise be, because they are training their minds to experience themselves as porous in similar ways. This also points to the training aspect being central to debates about minds in different cultural settings (Cassaniti & Luhrmann, 2014;Kirmayer & Ramstead, 2017;Williams, 2020). I would argue that the conceptual approach to minds and mental illness, although building on Luhrmann's (2012a) work from North America, is applicable in an Acholi context not just because it deals with a similar kind of religious practice, but because of the way these religious practices are conceptualized; as cultural skills that are learned and that come to work as tools of the mind, or as cultural affordances that shape "regimes of attention" (Ramstead, Veissi ere, & Kirmayer, 2016, p. 3) or "cultural expectations" (Cassaniti & Luhrmann, 2014, p. 333).…”
Section: Training Regimes Of Attention Through Prayermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bringing in details of one person's story also makes comparison more accessible within broader conversation and debates on concepts of minds and mental disorders in different geographical and cultural contexts. In this approach, I mainly follow Meinert andWhyte (2017, 2020) in their studies using single extended cases 5 of similar issues in northern Uganda (see also Williams & Meinert, 2017, 2020. This approach also follows a legacy of medical and psychological anthropology, where single informants or families take on a central role in case representation (Biehl, 2013;Desjarlais, 1996;Good, 1993;Luhrmann, 2012b;Luhrmann & Marrow, 2016;Mattingly, 2014).…”
Section: Fieldworkmentioning
confidence: 99%