“…This training in porousness renders the North American evangelicals more similar to my Ugandan informants than they might otherwise be, because they are training their minds to experience themselves as porous in similar ways. This also points to the training aspect being central to debates about minds in different cultural settings (Cassaniti & Luhrmann, 2014;Kirmayer & Ramstead, 2017;Williams, 2020). I would argue that the conceptual approach to minds and mental illness, although building on Luhrmann's (2012a) work from North America, is applicable in an Acholi context not just because it deals with a similar kind of religious practice, but because of the way these religious practices are conceptualized; as cultural skills that are learned and that come to work as tools of the mind, or as cultural affordances that shape "regimes of attention" (Ramstead, Veissi ere, & Kirmayer, 2016, p. 3) or "cultural expectations" (Cassaniti & Luhrmann, 2014, p. 333).…”