2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training to Improve Precision and Accuracy in the Measurement of Fiber Morphology

Abstract: An estimated $7.1 billion dollars a year is spent due to irreproducibility in pre-clinical data from errors in data analysis and reporting. Therefore, developing tools to improve measurement comparability is paramount. Recently, an open source tool, DiameterJ, has been deployed for the automated analysis of scanning electron micrographs of fibrous scaffolds designed for tissue engineering applications. DiameterJ performs hundreds to thousands of scaffold fiber diameter measurements from a single micrograph wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a. To evaluate the segmentation from the leaky DRAQ5 signal, we used an established approach that relies on manually monitoring the automated detection results on a set of test images [10]; similar human-comparison approaches have been used elsewhere [11, 12]. The evaluation was performed by applying the selected frames on the corresponding bright-field image (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a. To evaluate the segmentation from the leaky DRAQ5 signal, we used an established approach that relies on manually monitoring the automated detection results on a set of test images [10]; similar human-comparison approaches have been used elsewhere [11, 12]. The evaluation was performed by applying the selected frames on the corresponding bright-field image (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall thickness measurements were taken from 150× images of five graft cross‐sections ( n = 5). Fiber orientation and diameter were measured from 1,000× en face images using the DiameterJ v1.018 plugin for FIJI running ImageJ 1.51w (Hotaling et al, 2016; Hotaling, Bharti, Kriel, & Simon, 2015). Three 1,000× images were analyzed from each of five graft segments for a total of 15 images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) The spinneret and focusing electrodes viewed from the top right. The tip of the needle and the vertical portions of the focusing electrodes are coplanar running ImageJ 1.51w (Hotaling et al, 2016;Hotaling, Bharti, Kriel, & Simon, 2015). Three 1,000× images were analyzed from each of five graft segments for a total of 15 images.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images analyzed were prepared with magnification 3000X. The systematic error observed for nontrained DiameterJ operators has been considerably reduced after completion of the DiameterJ online training [8], showing that the human factor can greatly affect the quality of the characterization. This fact suggests an opportunity for machine learning improvement of the segmentation choice process.…”
Section: Quality Of Image Analysis For Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%