Trait‐based approaches as ecological time machines: Developing tools for reconstructing long‐term variation in ecosystems

Abstract

Research over the past decade has shown that quantifying spatial variation in ecosystem properties is an effective approach to investigating the effects of environmental change on ecosystems. Yet, current consensus among scientists is that we need a better understanding of short‐ and long‐term (temporal) variation in ecosystem properties to plan effective ecosystem management and predict future ecologies. Trait‐based approaches can be used to reconstruct ecosystem properties from long‐term ecological records and contribute significantly to developing understandings of ecosystem change over decadal to millennial time‐scales. Here, we synthesise current trait‐based approaches and explore how organisms' functional traits (FTs) can be scaled across time and space. We propose a framework for reconstructing long‐term variation in ecosystems by means of analysing FTs derived from palaeoecological datasets. We then summarise challenges that must be overcome to reconcile trait‐based approaches with palaeo‐datasets. Finally, we discuss the benefits and limitations of trait‐based reconstructions of ecosystem temporal dynamics and suggest future directions for research. Reconstructing environmental properties through time vis‐à‐vis FTs can be separated into two parts. The first is to record trait data for organisms present in modern ecosystems, and the second is to reconstruct temporal variability in FTs from palaeoecological datasets, capturing changes in trait composition over time. Translating palaeoecological datasets into FTs is challenging due to taphonomic, taxonomic and chronological uncertainties, as well as uniformitarian assumptions. Explicitly identifying and addressing these challenges is important to effectively calculate changes in FT through time. Palaeo‐trait research offers insights into questions related to short‐ and long‐term ecosystem functioning, environmental change and extinction and community assembly rules across time. As work in this area matures, we expect that trait‐based approaches integrating palaeoecology and neo‐ecology will improve understanding of past ecologies and provide a deeper insight of their implications for present‐day and future ecosystem management and conservation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Climate change and the variability in community structure of Alpine Lepidoptera: unstable spring and fuzzy autumn

“…Indeed, in our study regions, temperature increases were higher at intermediate and higher altitudes compared to lowlands (Fig. A1), but so far, phenological shifts at higher altitudes have mainly been reported in plants (Inouye, 2020 Similar to the keystone concept of food web ecology, it assumes that a few functionally important species might su ce to reconstruct climate induced changes in species interactions and community functionality from species traits (Brown et al 2023). While this concept has been developed for birds, it is generally applicable also to insect taxa for which su cient trait data are available.…”

Using ancient sedimentary DNA to forecast ecosystem trajectories under climate change

“…It is common to make other simultaneous measurements such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), magnetic susceptibility, stable isotopes (N and C) and biomarkers [51][52][53]. In addition, independent climate reconstructions such as CHELSA [54], NGRIP [55], oxygen isotope [56,57] or chironomids may be used [19], although, as with all palaeoproxies, one has to account for uncertainties due to different spatial and temporal resolution [58]. These provide important information about changes in the environment.…”

Ten simple rules to bridge ecology and palaeoecology by publishing outside palaeo-ecological journals

“…This preconception barrier of diverse audiences to "palaeo" methods and the time constraint in engaging with these audiences often leads to the classification of palaeoecology as a separate field rather than a discipline of ecology (Rull, 2014). Progress in effective collaboration through open science (Koren et al, 2022) and computational palaeoecology (e.g., Anderson et al, 2006;Nieto-Lugilde et al, 2021;Chevalier, 2022), as well as adopting approaches that have so far been applied mainly in for ecological studies (e.g., the use of organismal functional traits; Marcisz et al, 2020;Brown et al, 2023) have enhanced the capability to integrate long palaeo-records of microbiota, plants, animals, and abiotic factors with directly observed modern records (data spanning the last 50 years or less; Dillon et al, 2023) (Fig 1). Still, more effort and input are needed from palaeoresearchers (researchers working with palaeoarchives) to integrate palaeoecology within the broader field of ecology sufficiently to routinely include a palaeo-perspective in scientific discussions about the present and future environmental challenges (Camperio et al, 2023).…”