2022
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2135374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trait mindfulness and mind-body health in students: The role of gender, race, and ethnicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we performed prespecified subgroup analyses to investigate differences in the outcome measure between (1) different methods of intervention delivery (via messenger/SMS, a mobile application, a website, or online face-to-face), (2) studies with or without pre-registration, (3) studies including or lacking intention-to-treat analyses, (4) studies comparing the intervention to an active or non-active control group, (5) studies including subjects with baseline mental health above or below the clinically relevant threshold, and (6) studies with a low vs. moderate vs. high risk of bias according to the RoB2 tool [ 41 ]. In two post hoc moderator analyses, we examined differences between the predominant ethnicities of the sample (US Caucasians vs. European Caucasians vs. Asians) since some studies suggest an altered susceptibility to mindfulness interventions depending on the ethnic group [ 45 , 46 ] and we investigated the influence of the percentage of primiparous mothers in the sample, an established risk factor for mental health issues in pregnant women [ 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we performed prespecified subgroup analyses to investigate differences in the outcome measure between (1) different methods of intervention delivery (via messenger/SMS, a mobile application, a website, or online face-to-face), (2) studies with or without pre-registration, (3) studies including or lacking intention-to-treat analyses, (4) studies comparing the intervention to an active or non-active control group, (5) studies including subjects with baseline mental health above or below the clinically relevant threshold, and (6) studies with a low vs. moderate vs. high risk of bias according to the RoB2 tool [ 41 ]. In two post hoc moderator analyses, we examined differences between the predominant ethnicities of the sample (US Caucasians vs. European Caucasians vs. Asians) since some studies suggest an altered susceptibility to mindfulness interventions depending on the ethnic group [ 45 , 46 ] and we investigated the influence of the percentage of primiparous mothers in the sample, an established risk factor for mental health issues in pregnant women [ 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%