2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trait self-focused attention increases sensitivity to nonconscious primes: Evidence from effort-related cardiovascular reactivity

Abstract: A broad range of primes presented outside of awareness—ranging from emotional faces to people’s first names—can influence the physiological mobilization of effort during active coping tasks. Who responds more strongly to implicit cues? Based on models of self-awareness, the present research examined how individual differences in self-focused attention influence sensitivity to nonconscious primes. Adults completed a challenging cognitive task in which two kinds of primes were presented (people’s first names and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects were stronger for effort-related physiology than for behavioral task performance, a common finding in our research (e.g., Silvia, 2012; Silvia et al, 2011a, 2011b; Silvia, Kelly, Zibaie, Nardello, & Moore, in press; Silvia, McCord, & Gendolla, 2010) and in motivational intensity research generally. Effort is one of several contributions to task performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The effects were stronger for effort-related physiology than for behavioral task performance, a common finding in our research (e.g., Silvia, 2012; Silvia et al, 2011a, 2011b; Silvia, Kelly, Zibaie, Nardello, & Moore, in press; Silvia, McCord, & Gendolla, 2010) and in motivational intensity research generally. Effort is one of several contributions to task performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For each physiological outcome, scores for the 5 baseline minutes were averaged to form a baseline value, and scores for the 3 parity task minutes were averaged to form a task value. We analyzed the data using regression models, as in our recent work [ 43 , 44 ]. Reactivity scores—change from baseline to task—were computed by subtracting the baseline value from the task value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the easy condition, all the items appeared for 2000 ms; in the medium condition, 67% of the items appears for 2000 ms and 33% appeared for 750 ms; in the hard condition, 33% of the items appeared for 2000 ms and 67% appeared for 750 ms; and in the very hard condition, all the items appeared for 750 ms. These response windows were based on our extensive past research with this task with similar samples (e.g., Silvia, Kelly, Zibaie, Nardello, & Moore, 2013; Silvia, McCord, & Gendolla, 2010; Silvia, Moore, & Nardello, 2014). In all cases, the item remained on screen for the full response window.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%