2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82377-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traitements de substitution en milieu carcéral : guide des bonnes pratiques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7.8% of drug addicts in French prisons received OST) [23]. In most European countries that offered OST in prison, access to and varieties of available OST programmes were heterogeneous and inconsistent [5,24].…”
Section: Current State Of Drug Treatment Health Care Efforts For Inmatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7.8% of drug addicts in French prisons received OST) [23]. In most European countries that offered OST in prison, access to and varieties of available OST programmes were heterogeneous and inconsistent [5,24].…”
Section: Current State Of Drug Treatment Health Care Efforts For Inmatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 4 months in prison, the rate of illicit use of morphine was 27% for MMT-treated prisoners and 42% for controls ( P = 0.05) [39]. The use of buprenorphine maintenance therapy in prisons has been based chiefly on results obtained outside prisons [23,25]; however, there is growing experience with buprenorphine in prisons [29]. A group of prisoners receiving buprenorphine reported for their designated post-release treatment programme significantly more often than did a comparison group receiving methadone (48% vs. 14%, respectively; P < 0.001) [40].…”
Section: Rationales For Drug Dependence Treatment In Prisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a timely review, because concern about the adequacy and quality of health services for prisoners and about equivalence of care between community and prison has become more prominent over recent years [11,12]. The World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) have recommended OMT in prisons, and some countries have introduced changes [8,13–15]. This is encouraging, but delivering services means more than making recommendations and changing policies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been essential improvements in the last 10 years . Several factors affect the extent to which prisons provide MAT, including the varied prison health policies of prisons and difficulties in employing adequate numbers of high-quality prison staff (Michel and Maguet, 2005). Some people living in prisons had been prevented from entering an MAT programme because of restrictive criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%