1978
DOI: 10.1016/0094-730x(78)90023-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traits attributed to stuttering and nonstuttering children by their mothers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
44
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are studies linking temperamental characteristics to stuttering in preschool and school-age children, however. Results of these studies, based on several methodologies, have indicated that young children who stutter (CWS), when compared to children who do not stutter (CWNS), are (a) less successful in maintaining attention and adapting to their environment (Embrechts et al, 1998), (b) less adaptable to change, differences and novelty, less rhythmic in their daily life activities, and less distractible (Anderson et al, 2003), (c) more reactive to environmental stimuli (Wakaba, 1998), and (d) more sensitive, anxious, introverted, and withdrawn (Fowlie & Cooper, 1978;Glasner, 1949). One contradictory finding was that of Lewis and Goldberg (1997), who found that children "at-risk for stuttering" exhibited temperamental profiles consistent with high adaptability to change and a positive approach to new stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies linking temperamental characteristics to stuttering in preschool and school-age children, however. Results of these studies, based on several methodologies, have indicated that young children who stutter (CWS), when compared to children who do not stutter (CWNS), are (a) less successful in maintaining attention and adapting to their environment (Embrechts et al, 1998), (b) less adaptable to change, differences and novelty, less rhythmic in their daily life activities, and less distractible (Anderson et al, 2003), (c) more reactive to environmental stimuli (Wakaba, 1998), and (d) more sensitive, anxious, introverted, and withdrawn (Fowlie & Cooper, 1978;Glasner, 1949). One contradictory finding was that of Lewis and Goldberg (1997), who found that children "at-risk for stuttering" exhibited temperamental profiles consistent with high adaptability to change and a positive approach to new stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shown to exist among parents (Crowe & Cooper, 1977;Fowlie & Cooper, 1978;Woods & Williams, 1976), speech language clinicians Cooper & Rustin, 1985;Lass, Ruscello, Pannbacker, Schmitt, & Everly-Myers, 1989;Turnbaugh, Guitar, & Hoffman, 1979), students (St. Louis & Lass, 1981;White & Collins, 1984), store clerks (McDonald & Frick, 1954), teachers (Crowe & Cooper, 1977;Crowe & Walton, 1981;Lass, Ruscello, Schmitt, Pannbacker, Orlando, Dean, Ruziska, & Bradshaw), vocational rehabilitation counselors , and employers .…”
Section: Stereotypes Of Stutterersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from published studies, based on several different methodologies, have generally indicated that young CWS, when compared to CWNS, are (a) less successful in maintaining attention and adapting to their environment (Embrechts et al, 2000), (b) more reactive to environmental stimuli (Wakaba, 1998), and (c) more sensitive, anxious, introverted, and withdrawn (Fowlie & Cooper, 1978;Glasner, 1949). Several unpublished studies have also reported that CWS tend to have higher levels of sensitivity than CWNS (LaSalle, 1999;Oyler, 1996Oyler, , 1999Oyler & Ramig, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three additional studies, one published and two unpublished, in which school-age CWS were included as participants (Fowlie & Cooper, 1978;Oyler, 1996;Oyler & Ramig, 1995). These researchers reported significant differences in temperamental characteristics between school-age CWS and CWNS-for example, CWS are reportedly more sensitive and withdrawn than CWNS (Fowlie & Cooper, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation