Traits of Leaders of Rural Non-governmental Organisations as Predictors of Collaboration Between NGOs and Rural Gmina Offices: Voices from Central Poland

Abstract

Collaboration between non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and public institutions, in accordance with the new public governance model, may contribute to actions by such organisations on behalf of both the co-production and co-construction of social services. The aim of this article is to assess the role of selected traits of NGO leaders in determining the chances of collaboration between NGOs and rural gmina offices in central, postsocialist Poland. The authors present the results of studies on selected subjective determinants of such collaboration, in which 104 leaders of NGOs from 29 rural gminas participated. Five independent research tools were implemented. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the role of selected traits of NGO leaders in determining the potential for collaboration between NGOs and rural gmina offices. The final model indicates that the potential for collaboration between an NGO and a rural gmina office increases alongside higher levels of education, social competences and locus of control and decreased control ideology among NGO leaders. On this basis, the authors formulate practical conclusions concerning the education of leaders of rural NGOs in post-socialist Poland.

Caractéristiques distinctives des institutions publiques rurales mettant en oeuvre des innovations sociales locales. Rapports de la Pologne

“…Parallèlement, la source de la mise en oeuvre de l'innovation sociale est la critique de pratiques inefficaces ou dont l'efficacité est insatisfaisante, le désir de les modifier afin d'accroître la qualité de vie au sens large, y compris l'élimination des problèmes sociaux locaux (Bock, 2016 : 561-562 ;Oosterlynck, Cools, 2020). Néanmoins, surtout dans les pays post-socialistes, comme la Pologne, caractérisés par un plus faible potentiel d'auto-organisation des habitants, y compris sous forme d'ONG formalisées (Chimiak, 2016 ;Karolewski, 2016 ;Zajda, Pasikowski, 2018), ce sont les institutions publiques qui peuvent jouer un rôle important dans la promotion de l'idée même d'innovation sociale, en mettant en oeuvre ses différents types.…”

Peculiarities of social business concept

“…Recent research by researchers around the world (Arantes, Zou & Che, 2020;Duffield, 2020;Hlatshwayo, 2020;Fathalikhani, Hafezalkotob & Soltani, 2020;Szczepanska, 2020;Zajda & Pasikowski, 2020) show that, in cases of disasters, crises, pandemics, social business in cooperation with various structures and organizations can contribute to solving various problems because social entrepreneurship fosters social cohesion (e.g., it employs vulnerable people, ensures equality -in many social business enterprises, women are managers and board members), and increases the social capital (social business builds trust, it solves problems that public authorities or traditional enterprises have previously failed to deal with), which creates new opportunities for employment and integration into the labor market; it also complements the provided public services (those municipalities which are looking for ways how to serve their people should include social businesses as partners). Social business…”