2008
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.9.1027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectories of Seclusion and Restraint Use at a State Psychiatric Hospital

Abstract: These findings have implications for clinical and administrative decision makers with regard to assigning new admissions to appropriate security levels, targeting patients with specialized treatment interventions, and moving low-risk patients into less restrictive treatment environments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
39
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent seclusion, this might mean improving the level of psychological and social functioning, which could lead to less coercive measures. In line with the findings of Beck et al (2008) and Clarke et al (2010), our study confirms that risk assessments should not only include aggression predictors, but also frequent mental health state assessments performed throughout the entire admission period.…”
Section: Dynamic Factorssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To prevent seclusion, this might mean improving the level of psychological and social functioning, which could lead to less coercive measures. In line with the findings of Beck et al (2008) and Clarke et al (2010), our study confirms that risk assessments should not only include aggression predictors, but also frequent mental health state assessments performed throughout the entire admission period.…”
Section: Dynamic Factorssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, Beck et al found discrete seclusion restraint trajectories in a state psychiatric hospital and recommended developing specific interventions for the high-trajectory class, while also considering modifications in treatment for low-risk patients. 23 In another study, 48 out of 155 adolescent females in an RTC accounted for 76% of the restraints. 22 Thus, a small subgroup of youth contribute to the majority of seclusion/restraint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…21 Similar methods used by other investigators have demonstrated that this categorization resulted in distinct seclusion/restraint trajectories. 22,23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that gender differences in the clinical presentation, and biological correlates of severe mental illness may result in a different use of coercive measures during the acute phases of psychiatric disorders and in hospitalizations for men and women [41,42]. Studies have found that physical restraint was used more often with male patients, while forced medication and seclusion was used more often with female patients [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male gender is also associated with higher rates of seclusion [43], restraint [44] and psychiatric intensive care [45]. Other studies have found that physical restraint was more often used with females [42] and female patients were more frequently secluded than their male counterparts [46]. No gender differences in the use of mechanical restraint have been found in studies conducted in the USA [47], or Finland, where all the forms of coercive measures studied were equally commonly applied to male and female patients [48,49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%