2022
DOI: 10.1177/21582440221086611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectories of Self-Esteem Development for Adolescence Based on China Family Panel Studies: A Piecewise Growth Mixture Model Analysis

Abstract: Self-esteem has always been a hot research object in the field of adolescent mental health. But in longitudinal research, using a single slope to describe the trajectory of adolescent self-esteem is unrealistic. The piecewise growth mixture model (PGMM) was used to fit the data in this study. Selecting from China Family Panel Studies database, a total of 1,759 individuals were selected and their self-esteem (RSES) scores over the years were used as the tracking index. Based on the characteristics of the develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of individuals of ages 14-23 in Norway found three self-esteem development trajectories: persistently high, chronically low and U-shaped (Birkeland et al, 2012). However, three different trajectory classes have been identified in Chinese adolescents: stable low, rapidly rising and rapidly decreasing (Huang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Self-esteem As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study of individuals of ages 14-23 in Norway found three self-esteem development trajectories: persistently high, chronically low and U-shaped (Birkeland et al, 2012). However, three different trajectory classes have been identified in Chinese adolescents: stable low, rapidly rising and rapidly decreasing (Huang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Self-esteem As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the across‐time transactions between parents and their children occur at the within‐family level, which implies the need for statistical methods that separating within‐family and between‐family variations (Nelemans et al, 2020). In addition, self‐esteem and social behaviours have both been observed to display heterogeneity at the within‐person level (Huang et al, 2022; Lee et al, 2022; Wiesner & Silbereisen, 2003). However, previous studies have relied primarily on between‐person analyses (Kanacri et al, 2021; Rothenberg, Lansford, Alampay, et al, 2020; Rothenberg, Lansford, Bacchini, et al, 2020); thus, they have not disentangled the stable between‐ and varying within‐person effects nor clarified the direction of the relations among variables at the within‐person level, leaving them open to erroneous inferences regarding the existence, magnitude and direction of causal effects (Hamaker et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%