A more pertinent reason to focus on message reception, rather than sending, is that the determination of skill in message sending relies heavily on accurate perception and understanding to determine if the sender has conveyed what they intended. Only a skilled receiver can reliably determine a skilled sender. It is also difficult to measure deficiencies in the sending of nonverbal messages because the lack of observer comprehension can always be blamed on poor communication skills at the receiving end.Increased comprehension of sent messages by the receiver, on the other hand, can compensate for a lack of skill in the sending of messages and can be objectively verified through replication across a variety of tests, regardless of the skill level of the sender.
6Finally, one of the reasons to restrict this project to the receiving end of nonverbal messages was to limit the scope of the project.The perception (or receiving) and understanding of nonverbal messages is referred to as decoding, so throughout this project I may refer to the "accurate decoding" of nonverbal behaviors, or how an individual is determined a more-or less-skilled decoder of that content by objective assessment to determine their ability level in comparison to others. The scores on these tests are a measure of nonverbal decoding skill (NDS), which is the variable being modeled in this project.What qualifies as a communicative nonverbal behavior is very broad across the literature examined here. Since even unintentional behaviors can convey nonverbal information, many researchers agree to include in this category everything that can communicate information except written and spoken words (Knapp, 1972;Matsumoto, Hwang, & Frank, 2016 Five of the more common theoretical perspectives used to explain nonverbal communication abilities are discussed here. These perspectives cover basic learning models, social learning models, a co-development perspective of skill acquisition, mirror neurons, evolution and genetics. I illustrate how each of these perspectives is currently adequately account for a large collection of these correlated variables, in a way that gives insight to the larger system of interactions, is the purpose of this project.
Learning ModelsCurrent explanations for NDS in adults are heavily concentrated on childhood learning models which also form the basis of adult learning models (Greene, 2003).These learning models focus on memory and generally involve two basic steps: the learning of associations and learning to generalize those associations from experience signals, one could infer more biological requirements associated with these senses. In addition to basic sensory systems, a working memory and cognitive skills would be necessary to deal with this information. The term "biological preparedness" is used to refer to the hard-wired ability to express the traits that allow for these accurate 11 perceptions and the interpretation of those perceptions. The steps of learningacquisition, refinement, and repetition-rely strongly on the prop...