Trajectories of Substance Use Disorder in Youth After Detention: A 12-Year Longitudinal Study

Abstract

Objective Identify trajectories of substance use disorders (SUDs) in youth during the 12 years after detention, and how gender, race/ethnicity, and age at baseline predict trajectories. Method As part of the Northwestern Juvenile Project, a longitudinal study of 1,829 youth randomly sampled from detention in Chicago, Illinois, 1995–1998, participants were re-interviewed in the community or correctional facilities up to 9 times over 12 years. Independent interviewers assessed SUDs using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children 2.3 (baseline) and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule IV (follow-ups). Primary outcome was a mutually exclusive 5-category typology of disorder: no SUD, alcohol alone, marijuana alone, comorbid alcohol and marijuana, or “other” illicit (“hard”) drug. We estimated trajectories using growth mixture models with a 3-category ordinal variable derived from the typology. Results During the 12-year follow-up, 19.6% of youth did not have an SUD. The remaining 81.4% were in 3 trajectory classes. Class 1 (24.5%), a bell-shaped trajectory, peaked 5 years after baseline when 42.7% had an SUD and 12.5% had comorbid/“other” illicit drug disorders. Class 2 (41.3%) had higher prevalence of SUD at baseline (73.8%). Although prevalence decreased over time, 23.5% had an SUD 12 years later. Class 3 (14.6%), the most serious and persistent trajectory, had the highest prevalence of comorbid/“other” illicit drug disorders—52.1% at baseline and 17.4% 12 years later. Males, Hispanics, non-Hispanic whites, and youth who were older at baseline (detention) had the worst outcomes. Conclusion Gender, race/ethnicity, and age at detention predict trajectories of SUDs in delinquent youth. Findings provide an empirical basis for child psychiatry to address health disparities and improve prevention.

Anhedonia, screen time, and substance use in early adolescents: A longitudinal mediation analysis

“…Deficits in self‐regulatory capacity in adolescence and difficulties in impulse control increase adolescents' susceptibility to maladaptive behaviors, such as substance use (Bechara, 2005; Casey, Jones, & Hare, 2008). Substance use in early adolescence has been associated with a plethora of adverse health outcomes and behaviors in adulthood, including the development of substance use disorders, criminal behavior, risky sexual behavior, unemployment, and difficulties in interpersonal relationships (Nelson, van Ryzin, & Dishion, 2015; Stueve & O'Donnell, 2005; Welty et al, 2017). Therefore, targeting adolescents earlier on in this developmental trajectory becomes an integral component to substance use prevention efforts, particularly in light of heightened risks associated with early substance use.…”

Changes in delinquency according to socioeconomic status among Finnish adolescents from 2000 to 2015

“…Delinquency has negative consequences for the individual, being associated with school dropout ( 31 ), substance abuse ( 32 ), mental health disorders ( 33 ) and criminality later in life ( 1 ). In addition to individual suffering, delinquent behavior has far-reaching impacts on society, impairing perceived safety in the community ( 34 ) and inflicting significant costs on the public economy ( 35 ).…”

Police decision-making with young offenders: Examining barriers to the use of diversion options

“…However, 82% of young Australians who were released from supervised detention in 2016--2017 returned within 12 months and 59% returned within 6 months (AIHW, 2018). Outcomes for young people with involvement in the criminal justice system include poor psychological well-being (McGrath & Weatherburn, 2012), low involvement in training or employment and problematic substance use following incarceration (Welty et al., 2017). Justice system involvement is associated with increased likelihood of future offending (Petitclerc, Gatti, Vitaro, & Tremblay, 2013) and contact with the system can disrupt what is typically a ‘natural’ transition away from offending (McAra & McVie, 2011).…”