2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.g003341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectory-Driven Adaptive Control of Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Disturbance Accommodation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work in the area of adaptive guidance algorithms include [2], which demonstrates an adaptive control law for a UAV tracking a reference trajectory, where the adaptive controller adapts to external disturbances. One limitation is the linear dynamics model, which may not be accurate, as well as the fact that the frequency of the disturbance must be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work in the area of adaptive guidance algorithms include [2], which demonstrates an adaptive control law for a UAV tracking a reference trajectory, where the adaptive controller adapts to external disturbances. One limitation is the linear dynamics model, which may not be accurate, as well as the fact that the frequency of the disturbance must be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) and so λC(s, p) = C(λs, λ −1 • p) in Eq. (9). Now, we will proof that the same properties hold for Eq.…”
Section: Appendix A: Proof Of Lemma Iii1mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In this sense, heading and attitude control in UAVs is very important [4], particularly relevant in airplanes (fixed-wing flying vehicles), because they are strongly non-linear, coupled, and tend to be underactuated systems with non-holonomic constraints. Hence, designing a good attitude controller is a difficult task [5,6,7,8,9], where stability must be taken into account by the controller [10]. Indeed, if the reference is too demanding for the controller or non-achievable because its dynamics is too fast, the vehicle might become unstable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H ∞ as a lower bound in (11). The above improvement is straightforward but is first provided in the present paper.…”
Section: Preliminaries For Computing the L∞-induced Normmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, these norms do not correspond to dealing with bounded persistent disturbances, which are often encountered in real control systems because of unknown external elements such as unexpected environmental changes. In connection with this, practical issues for bounded persistent disturbances have been extensively discussed in various fields, such as robot manipulators [8], humanoids [9], aerospace systems [10], [11], model predictive control [12], Markovian jump systems [13], networked control systems [14], and so on. When we are in a position to consider the effect of bounded persistent disturbances, taking the L ∞ norm is quite appropriate because the L ∞ norm of a signal corresponds to its maximum amplitude and the L ∞ -induced norm of a system corresponds to the worst maximum magnitude of the output for bounded persistent disturbances with a unit magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%