Trajectory of Viral RNA Load Among Persons With Incident SARS-CoV-2 G614 Infection (Wuhan Strain) in Association With COVID-19 Symptom Onset and Severity

Abstract

IMPORTANCEThe SARS-CoV-2 viral trajectory has not been well characterized in incident infections. These data are needed to inform natural history, prevention practices, and therapeutic development. OBJECTIVETo characterize early SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA load (hereafter referred to as viral load) in individuals with incident infections in association with COVID-19 symptom onset and severity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study was a secondary data analysis of a remotely conducted study that enrolled 829 asymptomatic community-based participants recently exposed (<96 hours) to persons with SARS-CoV-2 from 41 US states from March 31 to August 21, 2020. Two cohorts were studied: (1) participants who were SARS-CoV-2 negative at baseline and tested positive during study follow-up, and (2) participants who had 2 or more positive swabs during follow-up, regardless of the initial (baseline) swab result. Participants collected daily midturbinate swab samples for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection and maintained symptom diaries for 14 days. EXPOSURE Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The observed SARS-CoV-2 viral load among incident infections was summarized, and piecewise linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the characteristics of viral trajectories in association with COVID-19 symptom onset and severity. RESULTS A total of 97 participants (55 women [57%]; median age, 37 years [IQR, 27-52 years]) developed incident infections during follow-up. Forty-two participants (43%) had viral shedding for 1 day (median peak viral load cycle threshold [Ct] value, 38.5 [95% CI, 38.3-39.0]), 18 (19%) for 2 to 6 days (median Ct value, 36.7 [95% CI, 30.2-38.1]), and 31 (32%) for 7 days or more (median Ct value, 18.3 [95% CI, 17.4-22.0]). The cycle threshold value has an inverse association with viral load. Six participants (6%) had 1 to 6 days of viral shedding with censored duration. The peak mean (SD) viral load was observed on day 3 of shedding (Ct value, 33.8 [95% CI, 31.9-35.6]). Based on the statistical models fitted to 129 participants (60 men [47%]; median age, 38 years [IQR, 25-54 years]) with 2 or more SARS-CoV-2-positive swab samples, persons reporting moderate or severe symptoms tended to have a higher peak mean viral load than those who were asymptomatic (Ct value, 23.3 [95% CI, 22.6-24.0] vs 30.7 [95% CI, 29.8-31.4]). Mild symptoms generally started within 1 day of peak viral (continued) Key Points Question What are the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 G614 viral shedding in incident infections in association with COVID-19 symptom onset and severity? Findings In a cohort study of persons who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after recent exposure, viral RNA trajectory was characterized by a rapid peak followed by slower decay. Peak viral load correlated positively with symptom severity and generally occurred within 1 day of symptom onset if the patient was symptomatic. Meaning A detailed description of the SARS-CoV-2 G614 viral shedding trajectory serves as a baseline f...

SARS-CoV-2 virus dynamics in recently infected people – data from a household transmission study

“…These results are consistent with previous findings of variable Ct values by RT-PCR assay and time course of infection [10]. Other studies have reported differences in Ct values across individuals who were persistently asymptomatic [7,11], and this analysis contributes that daily symptom status (and not just overall symptom presentation) is associated with daily Ct values, with lower Ct values on days when participants experienced symptoms. Furthermore, dates of symptom onset preceded dates of lowest Ct values by a median of 4 days, suggesting relatively longer periods of rising viral RNA concentration following symptom onset compared to other studies [4,7].…”

“…However, Ct values can vary by assay, specimen type and quality, and time during the infection course, especially complicating cross-sectional comparisons. Use of serial specimens collected from one individual over the course of infection on the same assay can partially mitigate these concerns, yet few investigations have used serial sampling to describe the natural history of SARS-Co-V2 infection[4, 5] and even fewer have been conducted among the general population[6, 7].…”

Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection Is Associated With Higher Levels of Serum IL-17C, Matrix Metalloproteinase 10 and Fibroblast Growth Factors Than Mild Symptomatic COVID-19

“…However, while the Ct dynamics were similar in participants with or without symptoms, slightly significantly higher viral load was found at the time of first PCR+ in symptomatic participants. Other studies have found an association between severity and viral load as well ( 68 – 71 ). The modest differences in our study as compared to other reports might be due to the presence of minor symptoms in many of the symptomatic participants in our cohort.…”

High Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Lateral Flow Assay for the Point-of-Care Detection of SARS-CoV-2

“…The stratification of positive samples by RT-PCR Ct values may partially address this shortcoming since the patient’s viral load may be considered a proxy of disease severity and evolution. For instance, symptomatic individuals tend to have higher average viral loads than those who are asymptomatic [ 34 ]. Analogously, the maximal viral load typically arises early during the disease with a subsequent exponential decay leading to the viral clearance [ 35 ].…”