2018
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2852785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectory Optimization With Implicit Hard Contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we showed that contact-implicit optimization [18] can be achieved by solving hard contact constraints at the dynamics level through the inclusion of a time-stepping integration scheme. The encapsulating iterative linear-quadratic regulator (iLQR) [19] optimization procedure is able to discover hopping and walking motions for a single leg.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, we showed that contact-implicit optimization [18] can be achieved by solving hard contact constraints at the dynamics level through the inclusion of a time-stepping integration scheme. The encapsulating iterative linear-quadratic regulator (iLQR) [19] optimization procedure is able to discover hopping and walking motions for a single leg.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) by a time-stepping scheme [18]. The generalized positions are first updated by a forward-Euler step over half the time interval.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 State Integration By Time-steppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the solutions (10) and 14, the contact impulses are described as a function of joint configurations and velocities, and the Jacobian can be used to map these quantities to the contact velocity in (14). Afterwards, these terms can be substituted in (8b), which becomes a function of the joint positions, velocities, and accelerations only.…”
Section: Direct Transcriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using analytical derivatives (instead of Automatic Differentiation or finite differences) allows for efficient computation [2]. Differentiable physics has proven to be very useful for gradient-based algorithms for optimal control and trajectory optimization [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. However, the case of simulation with frictional contacts remains a challenging problem for the control community [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%