2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectory tracking of multi-legged robot based on model predictive and sliding mode control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include high computational demands, limitations in intricate environments, dependence on training data quality, and specialized designs that compromise versatility [88], [99], [100]. To address these challenges, proposed solutions involve integrating multiple control strategies like MPC, optimal trajectory planning, and reinforcement learning [101]- [104]. Hierarchical control approaches have also emerged to improve robot arm collaboration, enabling efficient multitasking while preventing collisions [105].…”
Section: Stability and Locomotion In Bipedal Wheel-legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include high computational demands, limitations in intricate environments, dependence on training data quality, and specialized designs that compromise versatility [88], [99], [100]. To address these challenges, proposed solutions involve integrating multiple control strategies like MPC, optimal trajectory planning, and reinforcement learning [101]- [104]. Hierarchical control approaches have also emerged to improve robot arm collaboration, enabling efficient multitasking while preventing collisions [105].…”
Section: Stability and Locomotion In Bipedal Wheel-legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, these advancements' primary focus is enhancing control strategies, allowing robots to manage intricate transitions and navigate unforeseen environments seamlessly [51], [74], [75], [181], [182]. Central to this progression is integrating predictive control, trajectory planning, and reinforcement learning, all contributing synergistically to optimize robotic performance [90], [91], [103], [104]. Furthermore, by factoring in the intricacies of diverse terrains and varied operational conditions, the practicality and versatility of these robots in real-world settings become increasingly evident [78], [80], [92], [93], [99], [136], [138], [183]- [185].…”
Section: Future Directions Of Control S and Design In Bipedal Wheel-l...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach enhanced performance in the presence of uncertainties, disturbances, and without the need for time-consuming tuning and analyzed the stability using the Lyapunov direct method. Gao et al [22] proposed a control strategy to achieve accurate tracking control of multi-legged robots by decomposing trajectory tracking into body-level and limb-level sub-control systems, utilizing a MPC strategy for the body-level subsystem and a robust adaptive terminal SMC for the limb-level subsystem, which greatly improves tracking accuracy and demonstrates omnidirectional mobility in various scenarios. Ma et al [23] presented a new reaching law-based control approach combining a sliding-mode disturbance observer and an enhanced two-vector model predictive current control enhances the dynamic performance and robustness of the permanent magnet synchronous motor to system disturbances.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) Referring to the equations(22) and(23), we can conclude: ๐ผ(๐‘˜ + 1) = ๐‘Ž๐ผ(๐‘˜) + ๐‘‡ ๐‘  ๐‘ข(๐‘˜)(24) The tracking error of the reference current in the proposed MPC controller is defined as follows:๐‘’ ๐ผ (๐‘˜) = ๐ผ ๐‘Ÿ (๐‘˜) โˆ’ ๐ผ(๐‘˜)(25) where ๐‘’ ๐ผ (๐‘˜) is the tracking error of the MPC controller. Considering the equations (24) and (25), we can predict the flow tracking error in the upcoming moments: { ๐‘’ ๐ผ (๐‘˜) = ๐ผ ๐‘Ÿ (๐‘˜) โˆ’ ๐ผ(๐‘˜) ๐‘’ ๐ผ (๐‘˜ + 1) = ๐ผ ๐‘Ÿ (๐‘˜ + 1) โˆ’ ๐ผ(๐‘˜ + 1) = ๐ผ ๐‘Ÿ (๐‘˜ + 1) โˆ’ ๐‘Ž๐ผ(๐‘˜) + ๐‘‡ ๐‘  ๐‘ข(๐‘˜) ๐‘’ ๐ผ (๐‘˜ + 2) = ๐ผ ๐‘Ÿ (๐‘˜ + 2) โˆ’ ๐‘Ž 2 ๐ผ(๐‘˜) โˆ’ ๐‘Ž๐‘‡ ๐‘  ๐‘ข(๐‘˜) โˆ’ ๐‘‡ ๐‘  ๐‘ข(๐‘˜ + 1) โ‹ฎ ๐‘’ ๐ผ (๐‘˜ + ๐‘) = ๐ผ ๐‘Ÿ (๐‘˜ + ๐‘) โˆ’ ๐‘Ž ๐‘ ๐ผ(๐‘˜) โˆ’ ๐‘‡ ๐‘  โˆ‘ ๐‘Ž ๐‘โˆ’1โˆ’๐‘– ๐‘โˆ’1 ๐‘–=0๐‘ข(๐‘˜ + ๐‘–)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, robotic manipulation has also expanded to a much broader scope, including manipulation in artistic applications [2] and anthropic environments [3], micro-and nanoscales manipulation [4] and swarm manipulation [5]. With the increasing demand for rapid response and high-precision control of robot manipulators, the improvement of tracking performance remains an attractive and open problem [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%