2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trans-Carotid and Trans-Radial Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: We aim to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of extra-femoral endovascular access for mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients whose vascular anatomy precludes safe or maneuverable trans-femoral access. Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis with articles published until March 2018. The search protocol, including research questions and inclusion and exclusion criteria, were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In modern times, direct percutaneous carotid puncture is used infrequently, but it can be used for neurointervention9 and cardiac intervention10 when alternate routes are unavailable or deemed higher risk. The risks of percutaneous transcarotid intervention have been studied in small case series,11–13 but they are generally not well known given the limited experience in the medical literature. Hybrid surgical-endovascular transcarotid procedures, the most well-known being transcarotid artery revascularization, has growing popularity and has been shown to be reasonably safe 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern times, direct percutaneous carotid puncture is used infrequently, but it can be used for neurointervention9 and cardiac intervention10 when alternate routes are unavailable or deemed higher risk. The risks of percutaneous transcarotid intervention have been studied in small case series,11–13 but they are generally not well known given the limited experience in the medical literature. Hybrid surgical-endovascular transcarotid procedures, the most well-known being transcarotid artery revascularization, has growing popularity and has been shown to be reasonably safe 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most cited alternative in the last years for the anatomical challenging cases has been the transradial approach, however the use of BGC was limited to few reports. 912 In a report by Haussen et al., 10 TRA was attempted in 15 (1.5%) of 1001 patients, however the authors did not describe the use of BGC. Chen et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transradial approach has become more popular in the neurointerventional field in the recent years, especially for diagnostic angiographies and aneurysm embolizations., However, there is a paucity of literature with the AIS experience. 912 Herein, we sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using the 8 F BGC Flowgate 2 transradially in patients with unfavorable anatomy (type 3 or bovine arch) during acute MT procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these situations, EVT through an alternative access route may be beneficial. Commonly used alternative approaches are through the radial, common carotid or brachial artery [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest is currently focused on radial access, as it is already widely used in coronary interventions. In the field of interventional cardiology, the radial approach is associated with lower complication rates and higher patient satisfaction than the femoral approach [13,16]. On the other hand, the small vessel diameter and the large amount of vascular anatomical variations may lead to a complex procedure, requiring specific experience of the interventionist [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%