Trans-Sutural Distraction Osteogenesis for Midfacial Hypoplasia in Growing Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate

Tong, Haizhou; Wang, Xingang; Song, Tao; Feng, Gao; Yin, Jianhua; Li, Haidong; Sun, Xinwei; Wang, Yongqian; Yin, Ningbei; Zhao, Zhihui

doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000001375

Cited by 31 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The original development and validation of the English FACE-Q scales have already been reported elsewhere. 3 – 6 However, a validation exercise became necessary before applying the translated questionnaires in orthognathic patients in Hong Kong. Translations further provide the possibility to explore questionnaires’ utility across populations and languages, as well as their cross-cultural validity that allows international valid comparisons of results or findings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthognathic Relevant Scales of FACE-Q: Translation and Validation for Hong Kong Chinese Patients

Tan

Leung

Tang

et al. 2017

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:A validated questionnaire is needed to study a more holistic outcome assessment including postsurgical aesthetic satisfaction and psychosocial changes in orthognathic patients. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of 9 orthognathically relevant translated FACE-Q scales among Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients.Methods:Two hundred fifty adult Cantonese-speaking patients of 18 years or older who underwent orthognathic treatment were recruited in the Prince Philip Dental Hospital of Hong Kong. Nine of an overall of 40 independent FACE-Q scales were selected and translated into Hong Kong Chinese. The reliability, validity, and test–retest reliability were examined using Cronbach’s alpha, paired t test and Pearson’s correlation coefficients.Results:The Hong Kong Chinese version of the 9 FACE-Q scales was obtained by forward-backward translation. One hundred eight male (mean age, 25.57 ± 4.49) and 142 female (mean age, 24.61 ± 4.54) patients were recruited for the reliability and validation process. The internal consistency (0.89–0.97) and the test–retest reliability (0.73–0.90) were found to be high. The validity of the translated questionnaires was comparable with that of the original FACE-Q.Conclusion:The results presented here prove that the 9 translated FACE-Q scales are reliable and valid instruments for research and clinical purposes in Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthognathic Relevant Scales of FACE-Q: Translation and Validation for Hong Kong Chinese Patients

Tan

Leung

Tang

et al. 2017

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…20 Following implant placement, the mean time to presentation is roughly 10 years. 18 , 19 Patients with BIA-ALCL usually display an isolated late-onset seroma, 21 an isolated new breast mass (8%), or both (7%), 17 although they can also suffer from capsular contracture, 22 – 24 axillary lymphadenopathy, 25 , 26 skin lesions, 27 , 28 and B-type symptoms. 29 , 30 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Allergan’s Biocell Implant Recall in a Major University Breast Center

Danino

Dao²,

Retchkiman

et al. 2020

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In May 2019, Health Canada released a national recall of all macrotextured breast implants that later became international in July 2019 regarding increasing accounts of suspected breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. In Canada, this recall targeted Allergan’s Biocell implants. This report presents the postmortem of this comprehensive single-center recall, which had to be undertaken in a limited time. Methods: Four months after the beginning of the recall, the authors analyzed the transcript of meetings to characterize the team assembled during the recall. Then, to reconstruct the systemic work plan as well as the crucial steps and actors of the recall process, a chronologic table of the 5 meetings held during the recall, agendas and transcripts of every meeting, electronic correspondences, and other documents created during the recall were consulted. Results: Between 1996 and 2018, 1260 women were affected by the recall, meaning that they received Allergan’s macrotextured implants. Ninety-two patients underwent explantation of the device or will undergo implant explantation. To this day, no patient was diagnosed with breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Conclusions: Our center’s experience highlights the utmost importance of building a national breast implants registry. We recommend breast centers to develop preestablished crisis centers and train staff to better prepare for future device recalls and minimize waste of time. Finally, we believe that implants should be identified based on the characteristics rather than their brand name.

show abstract

“…The early treatment options for midfacial hypoplasia mainly include distraction osteogenesis (DO) with Le Fort osteotomy (Scolozzi, 2008) and trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSDO) (Liu et al, 2005;Tong et al, 2015), which both progressively advance the skeleton in association with the expansion of the surrounding soft tissue. TSDO has been proved to have the advantage of achieving the advancement of midfacial skeleton by applying force to the immature circummaxillary sutures while successfully avoiding the risk of Le Fort osteotomy in some way, but there is still lack of recognition of the mechanism of the TSDO in growing CLP patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Unfortunately, most of these studies have only allowed favorable speculation about clinical skeletal changes from non-cleft patients with mild to moderate maxillary hypoplasia; therefore, the underlying mechanism of the TSDO in growing CLP patients is still unknown, especially in patients with severe forms. Recently, our center introduced bone-borne TSDO in growing CLP patients with midfacial hypoplasia, which essentially is the traction force enhancement of maxillary protraction with anchorage at the lateral nasal wall (Tong et al, 2015). The results of the initial color-coded map analysis of skeletal changes showed unequal advancement of the whole midfacial skeleton with a blurry boundary exactly matching the Le Fort III fracture line.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of midfacial skeletal changes after trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis for midfacial hypoplasia in growing patients with cleft lip and palate

Tong

Feng

Yin

et al. 2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trans-Sutural Distraction Osteogenesis for Midfacial Hypoplasia in Growing Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate

Abstract: Therapeutic, IV.

Cited by 31 publications

References 29 publications

Orthognathic Relevant Scales of FACE-Q: Translation and Validation for Hong Kong Chinese Patients

Orthognathic Relevant Scales of FACE-Q: Translation and Validation for Hong Kong Chinese Patients

Analysis of Allergan’s Biocell Implant Recall in a Major University Breast Center

Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of midfacial skeletal changes after trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis for midfacial hypoplasia in growing patients with cleft lip and palate

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About