Trans-Thoracic Minimally Invasive Liver Resection Guided by Augmented Reality

Hallet, Julie; Soler, Luc; Diana, Michele; Mutter, Didier; Baumert, Thomas F.; Habersetzer, François; Marescaux, Jacques; Pessaux, Patrick

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.053

Cited by 63 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An augmented reality (AR) superimposition of the P3DM onto the patient can provide the practitioner with a kind of "X-ray vision," easing the information transfer from the P3DM to the actual patient for a surgical procedure. Such AR technology can provide decisive information in minimally invasive (MIS) surgery such as trocar/instrument placement in thoracic surgery [1]. Indeed, the trocar placement can then be decided before the surgery on the P3DM (cf.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

On-patient see-through augmented reality based on visual SLAM

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3D camera tracking implies the computation, in real Port positioning with AR guidance during trans-thoracic minimally invasive hepatectomy [1]. a Preoperative trocar placement planning.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On-patient see-through augmented reality based on visual SLAM

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With augmented reality, a patient-specific virtual model can be created for open or minimally invasive surgery to assist surgeons in maintaining 3D interpretations, as in robotic procedures 8,75 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modalities for image- and molecular-guided cancer surgery

Stammes

Bugby

Porta

et al. 2018

British Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for many solid tumours. A wide variety of imaging modalities are available before surgery for staging, although surgeons still rely primarily on visual and haptic cues in the operating environment. Image and molecular guidance might improve the adequacy of resection through enhanced tumour definition and detection of aberrant deposits. Intraoperative modalities available for image-and molecular-guided cancer surgery are reviewed here.Methods: Intraoperative cancer detection techniques were identified through a systematic literature search, with selection of peer-reviewed publications from January 2012 to January 2017. Modalities were reviewed, described and compared according to 25 predefined characteristics. To summarize the data in a comparable way, a three-point rating scale was applied to quantitative characteristics. Results:The search identified ten image-and molecular-guided surgery techniques, which can be divided into four groups: conventional, optical, nuclear and endogenous reflectance modalities. Conventional techniques are the most well known imaging modalities, but unfortunately have the drawback of a defined resolution and long acquisition time. Optical imaging is a real-time modality; however, the penetration depth is limited. Nuclear modalities have excellent penetration depth, but their intraoperative use is limited by the use of radioactivity. Endogenous reflectance modalities provide high resolution, although with a narrow field of view. Conclusion:Each modality has its strengths and weaknesses; no single technique will be suitable for all surgical procedures. Strict selection of modalities per cancer type and surgical requirements is required as well as combining techniques to find the optimal balance.

show abstract

“…Optics are now reliably high definition, bright, gaining three-dimensionality, and even useful to enhance vantage points and lighting in open cases. They can expand human perception using near-infrared spectroscopy and augmented reality [33,34]. Because viewing angles and vision quality typically exceed open operation, this is no longer a reasonable mechanism for MIL inferiority.…”

Section: Nonrandomized Comparative Data Supporting Oncologic Equivalencementioning

confidence: 99%