2005
DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x05002056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transaction and abatement costs of carbon-sink projects in developing countries

Abstract: Projects in the forestry sector, and land-use change and forestry projects more generally, have the potential to help mitigate global warming by acting as sinks for greenhouse gasses, particularly CO2. However, concerns have been expressed that participation in carbon-sink projects may be constrained by high costs. This problem may be particularly severe for projects involving smallholders in developing countries. Of particular concern are the transaction costs incurred in developing projects, measuring, certi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cost includes establishment woodlots, 15 PFM units, project design documentation development, and validation to Voluntary Carbon Standards (UNIQUE 2010). While substantial, these cost estimates concur with existing literature on REDD project implementation costs (Cacho et al 2005, Antinori and Sathaye 2007, Nepstad et al 2007, WCS 2009. Resultant profits over the full 20-year REDD project lifespan were calculated in 2010 US$ using constant discount rates of 5% and 10% following Grieg-Gran (2006) and the Stern Review (Stern 2007).…”
Section: Estimating Revenues and Redd Profitssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This cost includes establishment woodlots, 15 PFM units, project design documentation development, and validation to Voluntary Carbon Standards (UNIQUE 2010). While substantial, these cost estimates concur with existing literature on REDD project implementation costs (Cacho et al 2005, Antinori and Sathaye 2007, Nepstad et al 2007, WCS 2009. Resultant profits over the full 20-year REDD project lifespan were calculated in 2010 US$ using constant discount rates of 5% and 10% following Grieg-Gran (2006) and the Stern Review (Stern 2007).…”
Section: Estimating Revenues and Redd Profitssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The median flow estimate represents a more stable and long-term figure for the study site. This estimate is also in line with the opportunity costs (ranging between US$39 and US$509) reported for similar land-use types (Cacho et al 2005, Chomitz et al 2005, Börner and Wunder 2008, Bottcher et al 2009). …”
Section: Opportunity Cost Estimationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…One mechanism that has received a great deal of attention is a carbon-sequestration based payment (Seeberg-Elverfeldt et al 2009). However, such programs often fail because of the difficulty in monitoring and verifying compliance, and with making and enforcing contracts with, and delivering payments to, many smallholders (Lockie 2013;Alix-Garcia et al 2012;Cacho et al 2005). Research needs to shift towards generating better evidence on a wider range of specific institutional structures and mechanisms that link smallholders to financing opportunities, including expanding the innovative use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and geo-spatial information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%