2008
DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transaction Costs, Neighborhood Effects, and the Diffusion of the Uniform Sales Act, 1906-47

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case I = 2, Proposition 8 shows that no symmetry condition is necessary. 26 See Berman (1965) and Honnold (1999) on international sales law, Ribstein and Kobayashi (1996) and Smythe (2008) on the diffusion of uniform laws in the U.S., and Kerr (1929) on the history of the Law Merchant. See also Cooper (1994) for more examples of spontaneous international policy coordination.…”
Section: The Elasticity Of Externalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the case I = 2, Proposition 8 shows that no symmetry condition is necessary. 26 See Berman (1965) and Honnold (1999) on international sales law, Ribstein and Kobayashi (1996) and Smythe (2008) on the diffusion of uniform laws in the U.S., and Kerr (1929) on the history of the Law Merchant. See also Cooper (1994) for more examples of spontaneous international policy coordination.…”
Section: The Elasticity Of Externalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 A natural conjecture is that legal practitioners and domestic firms will lobby against legal harmonization if it threatens their local monopoly while international firms will lobby in favor of harmonization. See Ribstein and Kobayashi (1996) or Smythe (2008) for an empirical estimate of the influence of legal practitioners on state adoption of uniform laws. See also Redoano (2007) for a model of lobbying in a fiscal federalism setup.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations