2013
DOI: 10.1111/deci.12033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transaction‐Specific Investments, Relational Norms, and ERP Customer Satisfaction: A Mediation Analysis*

Abstract: Integrating the perspectives of transaction cost economics, the resource-based view, and resource dependency theory, this study analyzes the institutional settings of enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations in China. Specifically, it examines how bilateral transaction-specific investments (TSIs) and relational governance mechanisms influence customer satisfaction with ERP implementations. The model is empirically tested using data from on-site interviews with 208 ERP customers in China. The results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with Chen et al. () who found trust to be a relational governance mechanism that moderates work practices, therefore complementing studies advocating the direct role of trust as an antecedent to work practices such as information sharing (Klein et al., ) and visibility, and outcomes such as satisfaction (Lai et al., ) and flexibility (Wang & Wei, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are consistent with Chen et al. () who found trust to be a relational governance mechanism that moderates work practices, therefore complementing studies advocating the direct role of trust as an antecedent to work practices such as information sharing (Klein et al., ) and visibility, and outcomes such as satisfaction (Lai et al., ) and flexibility (Wang & Wei, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Governance consists of informal and formal mechanisms (Tachizawa & Wong, 2015). Informal governance mechanisms are defined as structural arrangements intended to influence the behavior of organizational members in the form of trust as opposed to bureaucratic structures (Jones, Hesterly, & Borgatti, 1997;Klein et al, 2007;Ang & Inkpen, 2008;Lai et al, 2013;Huang, Cheng, & Tseng, 2014). Working with trusted partners is an important way to integrate action and improve system performance (Gittell, 2001).…”
Section: Ssp Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with prior studies (Lai et al 2013;Kumar 2002) we find both instrumental service and interpersonal service to be significant antecedents of relationship satisfaction. Given the even greater impact of value mindset, however, and the inter-connected nature of operant and operand resources in value co-creation, it is also important to understand potential interaction among the various operant resources.…”
Section: Interaction Effects Among Operant Resourcessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Instrumental and interpersonal service factors are core operant resources in that they serve to establish basic customer expectation levels (Bruhn and Frommeyer 2004;Lai et al 2013). These service components are the minimum expected by buyers in today's hypercompetitive sales environment, with lengthening sales cycles, increasing numbers of individuals involved on both sides of the dyad, and decreasing prospect conversion rates and margins (Adamson et al 2013;Evans et al 2012).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation