2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1132-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Long-term oncologic results

Abstract: Our data support that transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an adequate treatment for T1 low-risk tumor, and no additional measures are required. For T2 low-risk lesions, our study showed a higher local recurrence rate than that reported after radical surgery but a similar survival outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In those cases, where completion TME is not performed, TEM-only is regarded as a palliative treatment option. In contrast to patients treated with curative intent, where literature is extensive [14-19], to our knowledge no literature exists on the course of disease following TEM for pT2 or more invasive rectal carcinomas without (neo-)adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in comparison to completion TME. This study presents the oncologic outcomes and short-term morbidity of patients with pT2 or more invasive rectal carcinomas, treated with TEM-only, and outcomes were compared in patients who did undergo completion TME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In those cases, where completion TME is not performed, TEM-only is regarded as a palliative treatment option. In contrast to patients treated with curative intent, where literature is extensive [14-19], to our knowledge no literature exists on the course of disease following TEM for pT2 or more invasive rectal carcinomas without (neo-)adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in comparison to completion TME. This study presents the oncologic outcomes and short-term morbidity of patients with pT2 or more invasive rectal carcinomas, treated with TEM-only, and outcomes were compared in patients who did undergo completion TME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A submucosal infiltration represented a significant risk factor for recurrences: 0% sm1, 16.7% sm2, and 30% sm3. Another prospective study (Ramirez et al, 2011) also supports transanal endoscopic microsurgery as an adequate treatment for T1 low-risk tumour and no additional measures are required. The five-year overall survival was 94% and cancer-specific survival was 96%.…”
Section: Transanal Resection (Tar) / Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgermentioning
confidence: 79%
“…TEM remains the treatment of choice for stage T1 low risk rectal carcinomas. Patient with pT1 sm2-3 and T2 low risk lesions should be considered high-risk cases if treated only by TEM (Morino et al, 2011;Ramirez et al, 2011).…”
Section: Transanal Resection (Tar) / Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients can undergo adjuvant radiation therapy to the rectum with the goal of eradicating any residual disease or any possible positive lymph nodes in the mesorectum, resulting in less morbidity and improved functional outcomes. Ramirez et al 71 looked at patients with "high-risk" T1 and "low-risk" T2 tumors who received radiotherapy following excision and found higher local recurrence rates when compared to radical surgery. However, survival outcomes were similar with a 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of 93% in the postoperative radiotherapy group.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, survival outcomes were similar with a 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of 93% in the postoperative radiotherapy group. 71 Nevertheless, it is important to discuss other alternative treatments with patients since this is not the standard of care and patients must understand the risk of recurrence.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%