2022
DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Vessel-Sealing Device Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III to IV Hemorrhoids: Long-term Outcomes From the THDLIGA Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Both transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy are safe for grade III to IV hemorrhoid treatment. Whether one of them is superior regarding long-term results remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term results after transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several meta-analyses comparing DG-HAL with SH draw the same conclusions, that DG-HAL is superior in terms of postoperative pain, immediate or delayed, bleeding and surgical site infection rates[ 12 ]. A few studies did not, however, find any significant differences between DG-HAL and SH[ 74 , 75 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several meta-analyses comparing DG-HAL with SH draw the same conclusions, that DG-HAL is superior in terms of postoperative pain, immediate or delayed, bleeding and surgical site infection rates[ 12 ]. A few studies did not, however, find any significant differences between DG-HAL and SH[ 74 , 75 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 2 years after surgery, there remained no differences in recurrence, complications, quality of life, or patient satisfaction between the groups. 51 A separate RCT of 98 patients, also comparing HAL to EH, found no difference in the symptom score at a 1-year follow-up between the groups, but the HAL group had a significantly higher rate of recurrent prolapse 1 year postoperatively (59% vs 31%; p = 0.008). 52…”
Section: Operative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus, efforts continue to develop operative techniques with less postoperative pain and faster recovery. Development of ultrasound scalpel, circular stapler, electro-thermal devices, and ligature vessel-sealing systems are all on this effort [10]. Non-operative interventions such as sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation, and laser hemorrhoidectomy are used as out-patient procedures for 1st and 2nddegree hemorrhoids [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%