2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-016-0546-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transapical transcatheter device closure of relapse left ventricular diverticulum: a novel minimally invasive technique for reoperation

Abstract: We describe a novel minimally invasive technique, transapical transcatheter device closure of relapse left ventricular diverticulum (LVD) under transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. The patient previously underwent LVD primary repair and mitral valvular replacement. The anatomical characteristics of the relapse LVD and its adjacent structures are detailedly delineated by echocardiography. The relapse LVD is then managed by transapical transcatheter device closure under TEE guidance. This novel minim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, transcatheter device closure of LVD has been reported in only two patients, both of whom had favorable outcomes [9,10] We suspect the transcatheter intervention may require an even smaller connection than direct suturing, such as 0.4 and 0.13 cm in studies of two patients with good outcomes after the transcatheter procedure [9,10]. In the present case, preoperative multidisciplinary discussion including two senior interventional cardiologists resulted in consensus for surgical resection, as the wide diverticulum connection was judged unsuitable for transcatheter intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To our knowledge, transcatheter device closure of LVD has been reported in only two patients, both of whom had favorable outcomes [9,10] We suspect the transcatheter intervention may require an even smaller connection than direct suturing, such as 0.4 and 0.13 cm in studies of two patients with good outcomes after the transcatheter procedure [9,10]. In the present case, preoperative multidisciplinary discussion including two senior interventional cardiologists resulted in consensus for surgical resection, as the wide diverticulum connection was judged unsuitable for transcatheter intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%