2014
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transarterial chemoembolization and bland embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first line treatment for patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma but is also increasingly being used for patients on the transplant waiting list to prevent further tumor growth. Despite its widespread use, TACE remains an unstandardized procedure, with variation in type and size of embolizing particles, type and dose of chemotherapy and interval between therapies. Existing evidence from randomized controlled trials suggest that bland transarterial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
50
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar OS for both DEB‐TACE and cTACE may mean that embolization, rather than the antitumor drug, provides most of the therapeutic effect. This is certainly consistent with the conclusions of several systematic reviews and research from our own group showing similar OS for TACE and transarterial embolization. On the other hand, the present meta‐analysis shows that DEB‐TACE leads to a significantly higher objective tumor response than cTACE, as reported in a previous meta‐analysis .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar OS for both DEB‐TACE and cTACE may mean that embolization, rather than the antitumor drug, provides most of the therapeutic effect. This is certainly consistent with the conclusions of several systematic reviews and research from our own group showing similar OS for TACE and transarterial embolization. On the other hand, the present meta‐analysis shows that DEB‐TACE leads to a significantly higher objective tumor response than cTACE, as reported in a previous meta‐analysis .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the veterinary field, adverse effects and treatment response to TACE remain unclear. Although there is still controversy regarding the efficacy of TAE versus TACE (Forner et al 2007), previous research in humans demonstrates that TAE may be as effective as TACE while being less expensive and devoid of adverse effects due to the lack of chemotherapy (Tsochatzis et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The embolic agents are injected to the target site with a minimally invasive procedure, through a catheter facilitating artery occlusion. This strategy provides localized therapy directly to hepatic tumours, leading to cancer destruction and protecting the rest of the liver against necrosis [11,12]. Over the years, a variety of embolic agents has been employed as liquids, coils, and particulate systems, classified as spherical or non-spherical [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%