2018
DOI: 10.5152/dir.2018.18090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transarterial embolization of renal cell carcinoma as an adjunctive therapy prior to cryoablation: a propensity score matching analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, and in agreement with other reports, no significant change in eGFR after the procedures was found in our study, suggesting that SAE before PCA is safe regarding the renal function [ 5 , 36 , 43 ]. In addition, no complication related to SAE, such as puncture site complication, occurred in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, and in agreement with other reports, no significant change in eGFR after the procedures was found in our study, suggesting that SAE before PCA is safe regarding the renal function [ 5 , 36 , 43 ]. In addition, no complication related to SAE, such as puncture site complication, occurred in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Embolization significantly decreased complications between size-matched lesions without impacting renal function or recurrence [ 5 ]. This is in contrast with another retrospective study that included 9 patients treated with SAE and PCA and 18 patients treated with PCA alone, in which no significant difference was found in the rate of complications [ 43 ]. However, a comparison of preprocedural and postprocedural hematocrit showed a 2.1 ± 15.4% decrease in the SAE + PCA group versus 9.3 ± 8.3% in the PCA alone group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.152) [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several case series have demonstrated that embolization prior to PA is both safe and technically feasible [16][17][18] ; however, a recent propensity score matching analysis failed to show an objective benefit to the combined approach as it relates to bleeding complications. 19 Both larger retrospective and prospective data are needed to address its clinical utility in either preventing complications or improving oncologic outcomes.…”
Section: Case Discussion and Review Of Renal Ablation Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%