1997
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1997.1008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transboundary Pollution Control in Federal Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
59
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The debate continues whether fiscal decentralization will improve or deteriorate environmental quality [13][14][15][16]. Environmental federalism held the opinion that the local governments would pursue economic development at the price of heavy pollution emissions when the spillover effect 2 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society was taken into account; that is, the impact of fiscal decentralization on the quality of environment was negative [17]. The traditional environmental federalism held the similar point that environment pollution had significant externality and it would lead to the phenomenon of environment regulatory "race to the bottom," lowering the standards of environmental regulator [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate continues whether fiscal decentralization will improve or deteriorate environmental quality [13][14][15][16]. Environmental federalism held the opinion that the local governments would pursue economic development at the price of heavy pollution emissions when the spillover effect 2 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society was taken into account; that is, the impact of fiscal decentralization on the quality of environment was negative [17]. The traditional environmental federalism held the similar point that environment pollution had significant externality and it would lead to the phenomenon of environment regulatory "race to the bottom," lowering the standards of environmental regulator [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silva and Caplan (1997) and Caplan et al (2000) analyze federal policy in the presence of transboundary externalities generated either by pollution or public consumption spill-overs. In these models, decentralized commitment proves beneficial since it allows externalities to be internalized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 See also the related literature on environmental policy; e.g., Silva and Caplan (1997), Caplan and Silva (1999) and Aronsson, Jonsson and Sjögren (2006). 2 This is further emphasized by the recent …nancial crisis in the Euro-area, where the option of leaving the European Monetary Union (which is part of the EU) has been discussed in some of the member states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%