SUMMARY
Diagnostic yield of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy (C-TBNA) without an on-site cytopathologist: Experience of 363 procedures in 219 patients
Introduction: Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy (C-TBNA) is a technique in evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes (LN). We aimed to investigate diagnostic yield (DY) and safety of C-TBNAs performed in a single university clinic.
Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 363 consecutive C-TBNA procedures in 219 patients. The DY and its relationship with location, shortest diameter, SUVmax of LN, and number of sampled stations were evaluated.Results: Procedures were diagnostic in 257 (71%) LNs. The most common diagnoses were malignancy (n= 109.30%) and granulomatous inflammation (n= 68, 18.7%) biopsy (C-TBNA) without an on-site cytopathologist: Experience of 363 procedures in 219 patients
INTRODUCTIONTransbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique for lymph node (LN) sampling to investigate etiologies of mediastinal and hilar LNs. Although TBNA was firstly described in 1949, fiberoptic bronchoscopic application was defined in 1981 (1,2). Besides conventional usage with white light bronchoscopy (C-TBNA), its bronchoscopic appliance can also be guided by newer imaging methods like endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS-TBNA).Conventional TBNA is a minimally invasive, safe, and cost-effective technique in evaluating mediastinal and enlarged LNs. Emergence and increasing use of EBUS-TBNA provided more information about this newer technique's diagnostic success and gave the opportunity to compare it with that of C-TBNA. The meta-analyses performed for the 3 rd edition of American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer Guideline yielded mean pooled sensitivities of 78% and 89% for C-TBNA and EBUS-TBNA, respectively (3). There are randomized trials with results suggesting better diagnostic results with EBUS-TBNA in both lung cancer and sarcoidosis patients (4-6). Despite better diagnostic results of TBNA with additional imaging, requirement for advanced devices, special equipment and experienced staff for the specific procedure makes wide range application of those techniques uneasy (7). Thus, C-TBNA may still be important for LN sampling in terms of feasibility and practicality. Herein we report the diagnostic yield (DY) and safety of C-TBNA performed in a single center at a university clinic.
PATIENTS and METHODS
PatientsThe study included 363 consecutively performed C-TBNA procedures in 219 patients who underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy and C-TBNA in the Bronchoscopy Unit of Hacettepe University Adult Hospital between October 1 st , 2012 and December 31 st , 2014. With the retrospective design, the study was approved by Hacettepe University Non-interventional Clinical Researches Ethical Committee. The files of the patients were reviewed retrospectively and available study forms were duly filled in. The age, gender, radiological findings, bronchoscopic findings, sampled...