Transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty: a case series in a university center

Garcia, Leandro de Borborema; Moussalem, Guilherme Figner; Andrade, José Santos Cruz de; Mangussi‐Gomes, João; Cruz, Oswaldo Laércio Mendonça; Penido, Norma de Oliveira; Testa, José Ricardo Gurgel

doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.05.012

Cited by 22 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They used tragal cartilage with pericondrium as graft materials. The success rate of perforation closure in their study was about 86.4% and statistically significant improvement in pure tone average thresholds after surgery was also observed (de Borborema Garcia et al., 2016). In the present study the graft survival rate was 90.9% which is slightly better than that of Gracia et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty:Is learning curve a myth?

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty in the hand of young beginner surgeons who had just completed the residency programme.MethodsIn a three year period (August 2012 to August 2015), 44 ears in 42 patients were operated upon by a beginner surgeon through the transcanal endoscopic approach in a subdistrict level hospital located in the north western ranges of the Himalayan region.ResultsOf the 42 patient, 19 were male and 23 female. The mean age was 26.23 years (range: 15–47 years). In 40 ears, complete perforation closure was achieved at six months (success rate: 90.9%). The mean air conduction PTA preoperatively was 40.84 dB HL and improved to 28.06 dB HL postoperatively (p < .001). The mean AB gap preoperatively was 22.40 dB, which improved to 9.1 dB postoperatively (p < .001).ConclusionEndoscopic transcanal myringoplasty is safe and reliable even in young beginners' hands. Surgeons can consider endoscopic approach early in their careers without the fear of learning curve. The cost of endoscopic equipment is about one tenth as compared to open approach under a operating microscope, and an added advantage.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty:Is learning curve a myth?

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This was contrary to study done by Leandro et al, which had 59% of patients presenting with a perforation in left tympanic membrane and 36.3% of patients with right tympanic membrane perforation. 21 10 Similary, in another study by Jana et al, in microscope assisted type I tympanoplasty, 89% had an improvement in conductive hearing loss with average between 0 and 20dB which was equal in the endoscopic group as well. 22 In our study, the post-operative graft uptake in case of endoscopic type I tympanoplasty is 90%, whereas in microscopic group, it is 80%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

An observational study of endoscopic versus microscopic type I tympanoplasty in tubotympanic chronic otitis media in a tertiary health care centre

Chowdhury

Das

2021

Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Chronic otitis media (COM) is a widespread disease in the developing countries. It is treated by tympanoplasty, traditionally performed with the microscope which limits the visual field in the deep recesses of the middle ear, especially in narrow external auditory canal. Using endoscope has minimised these difficulties by providing a wide field view with angled magnification, reducing the duration of surgery. The advantages and disadvantages of both techniques is evaluated in our study.Methods: In this observational study, 60 patients of tubotympanic COM between 12-60 years of age with small to medium sized central perforation and air-bone gap of less than 45 decibel were included. They were divided into two groups (group A and group B) of 30 patients each. Group A underwent microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty and group B underwent endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty. The duration of the surgery, the post-operative improvement in hearing and the graft uptake was analysed after 3 months of surgery. The post-operative hospital stay duration was noted. Results: The post-operative hearing improvement and the graft uptake after 3 months of the surgery was statistically not significant between the two groups. But the mean duration of the operation and the post-operative hospital stay was significantly lower in the endoscopic group with a p value <0.05.Conclusions: Endoscopes are better in otological procedures as it reduces the surgical duration, provides better visibility, lessens the post-operative hospital stay, reducing the economic burden of the patient.

show abstract

“…[ 16 ] While some have reported better improvements in the postoperative air bone gap (ABG) in the endoscopy group, others found no significant difference in the postoperative ABG in the two groups. [ 15 17 18 ] Compared to the microscope technique, the endoscopic technique was found to be more conservative, better at disease clearance while preserving the ossicular integrity resulting in less morbidity and fewer complications. [ 17 19 20 21 22 ] In this study, the major intraoperative complications encountered were bleeding while raising the tympanomeatal flap, control of which increases the operating time.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extending otology services to rural settings: Value of endoscopic ear surgery

Salisu

Jibril

2016

Ann Afr Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:Few centers, mainly located in urban settings offer otological surgical services, yet majority of patients requiring these services are rural based and are generally unable to access these centers with resulting disease chronicity and complications. This paper aims to describe the access of otological surgical services by a rural population.Methodology:This is a retrospective study of patients who accessed otological services at three secondary health institutions and one tertiary referral institution. All patients requiring ear surgery over a 4-year period were studied. The initial 2 years without ear endoscopic surgery was compared with the 2 years when ear endoscopic surgery was introduced. Hospital records were studied and relevant data were extracted.Results:Six hundred and nine ears required surgery over 4 years. Age ranged from 3 to 62 years, with a ratio of 1.4 males: 1 female. During the initial 2 years, all patients were referred from the three secondary health institutions to the urban-based tertiary institution for microscopic ear surgery, 94% failed to proceed on the referral. In the second 2 years, 34% were considered suitable for endoscopic ear surgery, of which 78% accepted and had surgery within the locality. Of the 66% referred, only 5% proceeded on the referral.Conclusion:With operator training and investment in portable ear endoscopy set, bulk of ear surgery needing magnification can be treated in the rural setting. This represents a most feasible means of extending the service to the targeted population.

show abstract

Transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty: a case series in a university center

Abstract: Transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty is a feasible, safe, and effective procedure; it can be an alternative to microscopic surgery.

Cited by 22 publications

References 18 publications

Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty:Is learning curve a myth?

Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty:Is learning curve a myth?

An observational study of endoscopic versus microscopic type I tympanoplasty in tubotympanic chronic otitis media in a tertiary health care centre

Extending otology services to rural settings: Value of endoscopic ear surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About