2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Historical perspectives, current evidence, and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering both costs and peri-interventional complications of TAVI, we think that patients at such high risk for postinterventional death should at least be considered for conservative, that is, optimal medical, treatment, even though it is well known that patients with severe aortic stenosis have poor prognosis with mortality being as high as 50% 3 years after diagnosis [2]. Considering both costs and peri-interventional complications of TAVI, we think that patients at such high risk for postinterventional death should at least be considered for conservative, that is, optimal medical, treatment, even though it is well known that patients with severe aortic stenosis have poor prognosis with mortality being as high as 50% 3 years after diagnosis [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering both costs and peri-interventional complications of TAVI, we think that patients at such high risk for postinterventional death should at least be considered for conservative, that is, optimal medical, treatment, even though it is well known that patients with severe aortic stenosis have poor prognosis with mortality being as high as 50% 3 years after diagnosis [2]. Considering both costs and peri-interventional complications of TAVI, we think that patients at such high risk for postinterventional death should at least be considered for conservative, that is, optimal medical, treatment, even though it is well known that patients with severe aortic stenosis have poor prognosis with mortality being as high as 50% 3 years after diagnosis [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of the Youden index, we calculated an optimal cutoff for patients considered for TAVI: Patients above our cut-off showed significantly increased mortality after 1 year, with mortality being as high as 49%. Considering both costs and peri-interventional complications of TAVI, we think that patients at such high risk for postinterventional death should at least be considered for conservative, that is, optimal medical, treatment, even though it is well known that patients with severe aortic stenosis have poor prognosis with mortality being as high as 50% 3 years after diagnosis [2]. To optimize quality of life for those patients, further studies comparing not only mortality but also hospital admission for cardiopulmonary decompensation and NYHA stadiums for TAVI vs. conservative treatment are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under general anesthesia as well as medium, low-temperature cardiopulmonary bypass, 11 surgery was performed through median incision, and then cold blood cardioplegia solution was perfused through the aortic root. For the patients whose aortic valves were not fully closed, direct perfusion after incising left and right coronary arteries or retrograde perfusion through the coronary sinus was employed, during which half of the cardioplegia solution was first given and the other half was given 0.5 h later.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morbidity and mortality rates are considerably high among patients not undergoing valve replacement. Once symptoms occur in these patients, the mortality rate is approximately 50 % over the next 3 years [4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%