2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Rheumatic Aortic Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survival rates of asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis are comparable to those of age- and sex-matched control cases [ 3 ]. However, the long-term survival in symptomatic cases without aortic valve replacement is merely 2 to 3 years [ 4 ]. Aortic valve calcification remains a mystery despite advancements in drastic therapies, such as valve replacement, and established interventional therapies for treating aortic stenosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival rates of asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis are comparable to those of age- and sex-matched control cases [ 3 ]. However, the long-term survival in symptomatic cases without aortic valve replacement is merely 2 to 3 years [ 4 ]. Aortic valve calcification remains a mystery despite advancements in drastic therapies, such as valve replacement, and established interventional therapies for treating aortic stenosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, procedural outcomes, including technical success and valve performance, were similar in patients with rheumatic and degenerative AS. Postinflammatory commissural fusion and fibrinous thickening of the aortic valve with limited calcification12 25 raised concern about adequate anchoring of THVs, and was one of the reasons why this population has been excluded from major randomised trials 9 10 12. However, in the present study, patients with rheumatic AS had a similar amount of aortic valvular complex calcification compared with patients with degenerative AS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Patients with rheumatic AS were, however, excluded from landmark trials, and the available evidence is limited to small case series and data from insurance claims without granularity on imaging features and concomitant valvular disease 6–10. Primary concerns to expand TAVI to patients with rheumatic AS relate to the typical morphological features of RHD with fibrinous thickening of the leaflets, commissural fusion, limited calcification and the frequent combination of AS with other valvular lesions less amenable to transcatheter interventions 3–5 7 8 11 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 However, in low income countries, where RHD is most prevalent, the access to cardiac surgery remains a challenge because of the lack of infrastructure and higher procedure costs. 31,32 Other potential limitations of SAVR are the need for lifelong anticoagulation in those young patients implanted with mechanical valves which can lead to poorer outcomes. 31,32 A recent publication with a Medicare cohort of 1159 patients with rheumatic AS who underwent SAVR or TAVR showed no difference in all-cause mortality and a lower rate of in-hospital complications in TAVR patients after a median follow up of 19 months, even though the TAVR population had more comorbidities and were more frail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 Other potential limitations of SAVR are the need for lifelong anticoagulation in those young patients implanted with mechanical valves which can lead to poorer outcomes. 31,32 A recent publication with a Medicare cohort of 1159 patients with rheumatic AS who underwent SAVR or TAVR showed no difference in all-cause mortality and a lower rate of in-hospital complications in TAVR patients after a median follow up of 19 months, even though the TAVR population had more comorbidities and were more frail. 33 Further analysis in the same study comparing TAVR for rheumatic versus nonrheumatic AS also demonstrated no difference in all-cause, in-hospital or 30-day mortality between groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%