2017
DOI: 10.1111/joic.12372
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The year in review 2016

Abstract: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continued to make major strides in 2016, simultaneously expanding its application to lower risk patients as well as more technically challenging subsets of patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The two major accomplishments this year were the establishment of TAVR as the preferred treatment strategy over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in intermediate risk patients, and initial signals that TAVR and SAVR may be clinically equivalent in low-risk populations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a revolutionary, relatively new catheter-based technique for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for a surgical aortic valve replacement [ 1 ]. In addition, recent studies have also suggested the potential use of TAVR for patients at intermediate [ 2 , 3 ] and low risk [ 4 ], as well as for a subset of patients whose aortic stenosis was more technically challenging to repair surgically [ 5 , 6 ]. Although TAVR is considered less invasive than surgical repair, patients undergoing TAVR usually have more comorbidities [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a revolutionary, relatively new catheter-based technique for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for a surgical aortic valve replacement [ 1 ]. In addition, recent studies have also suggested the potential use of TAVR for patients at intermediate [ 2 , 3 ] and low risk [ 4 ], as well as for a subset of patients whose aortic stenosis was more technically challenging to repair surgically [ 5 , 6 ]. Although TAVR is considered less invasive than surgical repair, patients undergoing TAVR usually have more comorbidities [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%