2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Latest-Iteration Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Valves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
13
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
13
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately one-fifth of the study 26 Despite the treatment of more complex anatomies, from 2017 through 2021, VARC-3 defined technical success and intended performance of the valve remained high and stable (Q4, 94% and 95%, respectively), with VARC-3 device success and early safety that even improved to 88% and 78%, respectively. These findings compare favorably with contemporary registries on TAVR 27 and will represent an important reference for future experiences in TAVR using SEV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Approximately one-fifth of the study 26 Despite the treatment of more complex anatomies, from 2017 through 2021, VARC-3 defined technical success and intended performance of the valve remained high and stable (Q4, 94% and 95%, respectively), with VARC-3 device success and early safety that even improved to 88% and 78%, respectively. These findings compare favorably with contemporary registries on TAVR 27 and will represent an important reference for future experiences in TAVR using SEV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Last but not least, the need for new permanent pacemaker implantation following TAVR procedures complicated by high-degree conduction abnormalities was similar in both our groups (8.6% for TA and 9.8% for TAO; p = 1.000) despite self-expanding valves (known for causing a higher incidence of conduction disturbances) were more often used in the TAO group (24% vs. 47.6%, respectively). These results are interestingly better than data recently reported from the multicentre OPERA-TAVI registry comparing very last-generation, self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter devices [15]. The permanent pacemaker implantation rate was reported as 17.9% for the self-expanding cohort and 10.1% for the balloon-expandable cohort.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…self-expanding (SE) versus balloon expandable (BE), with SE leading to higher rates of PPI and lower rates of PPM, as compared to BE. (10-12)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%