Transcatheter closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Yi, Kang; Liu, Chengfei; Zhi, Xu; Xu, Jianguo; Xiao, Dong; Zhang, Xin; Wang, Wenxin; Ding, Jingjin; You, Tao

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16708

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Prognostic indices in the IO group also showed slightly better outcomes. Yi et al 26 have noted that timely interventional occlusion stabilizes hemodynamics and improves patient survival rates when the perforation diameter is less than 12 mm. The interventional occlusion procedure primarily employs the femoral artery or internal jugular vein for occluder insertion, resulting in a lesser impact on the patient's body than surgical thoracotomy.…”

Section: Interventional Occlusion Is More Conducive To Postoperative ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of clinical efficacy and prognosis between interventional occlusion and surgical treatment for acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal perforation.

Ni,

Hu,

2024

Investigación Clínica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in acute myocardial infarction-related patients with inter-ventricular septal perforation (AMI-VSP) who underwent interventional occlu-sion (IO group) or surgical intervention (SI group). Forty-six patients were ana-lyzed based on comprehensive clinical data, laboratory results, and follow-up evaluations. The SI group had higher EuroScore II scores and more patients in Killip class IV. Both treatments showed improved laboratory indices, but the IO group had higher left ventricular ejection fraction and lower levels of specific biomarkers. The postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization time were shorter in the IO group. Survival rates did not significantly differ between the two groups during the follow-up period. Logistic regression analysis identified a history of coronary heart disease as a significant risk factor affecting progno-sis and survival rates. Both interventional occlusion and surgical intervention proved effective, with IO showing faster recovery and more favorable prognoses, while surgery was preferred for severe cases. Coronary heart disease was a key factor influencing postoperative survival in AMI-VSP patients.

show abstract

Section: Interventional Occlusion Is More Conducive To Postoperative ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of clinical efficacy and prognosis between interventional occlusion and surgical treatment for acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal perforation.

Ni,

Hu,

2024

Investigación Clínica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Transcatheter closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Cited by 1 publication

References 34 publications

Comparison of clinical efficacy and prognosis between interventional occlusion and surgical treatment for acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal perforation.

Comparison of clinical efficacy and prognosis between interventional occlusion and surgical treatment for acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal perforation.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About