Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009645.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving function and activities of daily living in patients after stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the effect of tDCS on manual dexterity of stroke patients and some specific aspects of their motor function appears to be consistent across laboratory studies (Kandel et al, 2012; Butler et al, 2013; Marquez et al, 2013), evidence for the ability of tDCS to improve activities of the daily living is still weak (Elsner et al, 2013), which questions the clinical relevance of tDCS for stroke rehabilitation. Clearly, large clinical trials are needed to settle this question not only for stroke but for any neurological disorders whose symptoms have been claimed to be alleviated by tDCS (PD, dystonia …).…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While the effect of tDCS on manual dexterity of stroke patients and some specific aspects of their motor function appears to be consistent across laboratory studies (Kandel et al, 2012; Butler et al, 2013; Marquez et al, 2013), evidence for the ability of tDCS to improve activities of the daily living is still weak (Elsner et al, 2013), which questions the clinical relevance of tDCS for stroke rehabilitation. Clearly, large clinical trials are needed to settle this question not only for stroke but for any neurological disorders whose symptoms have been claimed to be alleviated by tDCS (PD, dystonia …).…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Stimulation with tDCS has found similar outcomes with improvement after stroke during therapies and for short durations after stimulation (Hummel et al, 2005). Recent Cochrane reviews of rTMS and tDCS both conclude that further studies are required to determine these techniques’ role in stroke recovery (Hao et al, 2013; Elsner et al, 2013). Longer term efficacy is currently being studied with randomized, double-blinded trials to evaluate the utility of these treatment paradigms (Plow et al, 2013).…”
Section: Stroke Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 However, Cochrane reviews of TMS and tDCS concluded that further investigation is required to determine either technique’s role in stroke recovery. 45,65 A double-blinded pilot RCT to evaluate the long-term efficacy of tDCS found evidence that stimulation of higher motor areas can help recruit adaptation of the contralesional hemisphere in patients with greater ipsilesional injury. 36,125 In sum, the promise of noninvasive neuromodulation for stroke recovery, while demonstrating early promise, 13,74 has not borne out in larger clinical trials (Table 2).…”
Section: Neuromodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%