2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Versus Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Post Stroke Dysphagia: A Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both outcomes were more favourable than those of the control group, according to the results. However, high frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation produced greater results in swallowing disturbance questionnaire and PAS 48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both outcomes were more favourable than those of the control group, according to the results. However, high frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation produced greater results in swallowing disturbance questionnaire and PAS 48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, high frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation produced greater results in swallowing disturbance questionnaire and PAS. 48 The working mechanism behind SNMES has been a controversial subject of the treatment since its introduction, mainly because of a limited number of related studies. Sulica 29 and Teismann 30 demonstrated that the absence of sensory input from the oropharyngeal region resulted in difficulty swallowing, suggesting the involvement of its influence in the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of rTMS in enhancing swallowing function. Both HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS interventions have shown positive outcomes in various studies targeting the ipsilateral or contralateral cerebral cortex of lesion ( Cheng et al., 2015 ; Lee et al., 2015 ; Park et al., 2017 ; Du et al., 2022 ; Hammad et al., 2022 ). Park et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine therapies such as postural substitution and adjustment of food texture do not have satisfactory effectiveness ( Reyes-Torres et al., 2019 ; Lin et al., 2021 ). However, recent studies have reported that noninvasive brain stimulation such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is effective in improving swallow function ( Chiang et al., 2019 ; Du et al., 2022 ; Hammad et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyway, among the strengths of tDCS, there are greater accessibility to treatment and possibility of home therapy, thanks to portable devices. Hammad et al [107 ▪ ] compared the effects of rTMS with those of NMES and found the first treatment more effective in patients with poststroke dysphagia.…”
Section: Treatment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%