2008
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2008.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Sonography in Movement Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sonography, midbrain is hypoechoic and it can be differentiated from the brighter surrounding basal cisterns. In case of SAH, such echogenic difference between these structures is emphasized 22 . Whether an uncal herniation is suspected, a deformation of the midbrain in absence of surrounding cerebrospinal fluid should be detected at TCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In sonography, midbrain is hypoechoic and it can be differentiated from the brighter surrounding basal cisterns. In case of SAH, such echogenic difference between these structures is emphasized 22 . Whether an uncal herniation is suspected, a deformation of the midbrain in absence of surrounding cerebrospinal fluid should be detected at TCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of SAH, such echogenic difference between these structures is emphasized. 22 Whether an uncal herniation is suspected, a deformation of the midbrain in absence of surrounding cerebrospinal fluid should be detected at TCS. Another technique for better visualizing an eventual temporal uncus displacement is by following the hyperechoic free margin of tentorium both in axial and coronal planes.…”
Section: Basal Cisterns Patencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the LN hyperechogenicity, few earlier studies only are available, showing that this nucleus was less often affected or even spared in typical HD (10). LN seems to be more hyperechogenic in the hypokinetic-rigid form of HD (19), as well as in patients with dystonia and Wilson's disease (22), although none of these studies reported the specificity and sensitivity of the hyperechogenicity observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One experienced ultrasound practitioner who was responsible for detecting echogenicity in SN. The results were evaluated by the criteria proposed by Bartova P et al [ 8 ] and divided into five grades. Grade I: the same as brainstem; grade II: with scattered points and thin lines slightly stronger than brainstem; grade III: with patches of moderate echogenicity but weaker than brain pool; grade IV: with patches of hyper echogenicity as the same as brain pool; grade V: with patches of hyper echogenicity stronger than brain pool.Grade I-II are defined as normal/SN-, and grade III-V as hyper echogenicity/SN+.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%