2022
DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2022.2029574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcribing toddler vocalizations: comparison of a modified naturalistic listening approach with phonetic transcription

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modified naturalistic listening in real time (NLRT) approach used in this study was found to be an efficient and reliable method for documenting emergence of consonants for research purposes. 23 Unlike phonetic transcription, which is more labor intensive and may be more likely to overestimate a child's speech production capabilities, NLRT is thought to mimic what parents’ perceive when listening to their child. Ramsdell et al 32 argued that parents attend to global sound patterns and attend less to phonetic detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modified naturalistic listening in real time (NLRT) approach used in this study was found to be an efficient and reliable method for documenting emergence of consonants for research purposes. 23 Unlike phonetic transcription, which is more labor intensive and may be more likely to overestimate a child's speech production capabilities, NLRT is thought to mimic what parents’ perceive when listening to their child. Ramsdell et al 32 argued that parents attend to global sound patterns and attend less to phonetic detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified Naturalistic Listening in Real Times (NLRT) Analysis. The modified NLRT analysis used in this study was described previously 23 and was performed using TimeStamper software. 24 This software identifies annotations of two different keystrokes: one for canonical syllables and one for noncanonical syllables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%